This is how I've been organizing my React / Redux projects because it's how they did it in the tutorial I followed. Is this what Flux architecture is and if not what would you call this?
Here's an example:
Component
class List extends React.Component {
componentDidMount() {
this.props.getPosts();
}
// etc...
}
const mapStateToProps = state => {
return {
posts: state.posts
};
};
const mapDispatchToProps = dispatch => {
return {
getPosts: () => dispatch(actions.getPosts())
};
};
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(List);
Action
const postsLoaded = posts => {
return {
type: actionTypes.POSTS_LOADED,
posts: posts
};
};
export const getPosts = () => {
return dispatch => {
axios
.get('http://api.something.com/posts', {})
.then(response => {
dispatch(postsLoaded(response.posts));
})
.catch(e => {
console.error(e);
});
};
};
Reducer
const setPosts = (prevState, action) => {
return {
...prevState,
...action.posts
};
};
const reducer = (prevState = {}, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case actionTypes.POSTS_LOADED:
return setPosts(prevState, action);
default:
return prevState;
}
};
export default reducer;
Flux is a design pattern. Redux is one of several libraries that implement Flux. The intent is NOT for you to "use Redux to implement Flux", but rather "use the Flux pattern by using Redux".
You can find a much better description in the docs below, but in simplest terms, the Flux architecture is based on a unidirectional data flow, which means that each piece receives data from one place, and outputs changes to another. The intent of this pattern is to eliminate "spaghetti code", where various parts of the application pass data in many different directions, which can eventually become very difficult to trace.
In other words, your components are the "View" in the diagram below.
And the cycle repeats.
This image and an in-depth overview of Flux can be found here.