I have a simple convert's imagemagicks command-line which I want to mimic with PHP's Imagick class:
convert \( "image1.jpg" \) \
\( -size 1x256 gradient:white-black \
-rotate 90 \
-fx "floor(u*10+0.5)/10" \
\) \
"temp1.jpg"`
That line outputs 2 images: temp1-0.jpg
which is just a copy of image1.jpg
and temp1-1.jpg
which is this one:
As you can see it's a simple gradient image with an effect that makes the gradient not that smooth. And that works perfectly with the command-line imagemagick.
Although when I try to mimic that line with PHP, it does everything correct but the -fx
part. The code is the following:
$canvas = new Imagick();
$canvas->newImage(1, 256, "white", "jpg");
$gradient = new Imagick();
$gradient->newPseudoImage(1, 256, "gradient:white-black");
$canvas->compositeImage( $gradient, imagick::COMPOSITE_OVER, 0, 0 );
$canvas->rotateImage(new ImagickPixel(), 90);
$canvas->fxImage("floor(s*10+0.5)/10");
header( "Content-Type: image/jpg" );
echo $canvas;
Like I said, it doesn't reproduce the fx
part but rather a normal white-to-black gradient.
I'm new to Imagemagick but I've tried to apply a much simpler effect with that function u+10
but still the effect won't be seen.
Am I missing something to make fxImage()
work properly?
Is there a workaround for an effect like that?
It looks like it's a bug in the Imagick library - The image is actually available, but as the return value of the function.
$canvas = new Imagick();
$canvas->newImage(1, 256, "white", "jpg");
$gradient = new Imagick();
$gradient->newPseudoImage(1, 256, "gradient:white-black");
$canvas->compositeImage( $gradient, imagick::COMPOSITE_OVER, 0, 0 );
$canvas->rotateImage(new ImagickPixel(), 90);
$fxImage = $canvas->fxImage("floor(s*10+0.5)/10");
$fxImage->setImageFormat('jpg');
header( "Content-Type: image/jpg" );
echo $fxImage;
Produces an image with a stepped gradient.
I've opened an issue for this on the Imagick github page.