Why don't the push_back in vector<> and list<> containers return the reference to the inserted element?

I realize I can get the iterator reference by calling back() but why not return it with push_back() as well? Is it for performance reasons? Or is it due to exception safety (similar to why pop_back() doesn't return the popped value)? In either case, please explain.


  • Various insert functions return an iterator for a very simple reason: the caller does not necessarily know how to get an iterator to that element. map::insert and set::insert return one because otherwise, the caller would have to search for the element.

    When you do a vector::push_back, you know where the inserted element is. It's --vector.end(). You don't have to search for it; it's always that location. You can get it in constant time, and pretty quick constant time at that.

    So there's really no point in returning something that the user already knows.