Search code examples
javacastingoperatorsvariable-assignmentassignment-operator

Why don't Java's +=, -=, *=, /= compound assignment operators require casting?

Until today, I thought that for example:

i += j;

Was just a shortcut for:

i = i + j;

But if we try this:

int i = 5;
long j = 8;

Then i = i + j; will not compile but i += j; will compile fine.

Does it mean that in fact i += j; is a shortcut for something like this i = (type of i) (i + j)?

Solution

  • As always with these questions, the JLS holds the answer. In this case §15.26.2 Compound Assignment Operators. An extract:

    A compound assignment expression of the form E1 op= E2 is equivalent to E1 = (T)((E1) op (E2)), where T is the type of E1, except that E1 is evaluated only once.

    An example cited from §15.26.2

    [...] the following code is correct:

    short x = 3;
x += 4.6;

    and results in x having the value 7 because it is equivalent to:

    short x = 3;
x = (short)(x + 4.6);

    In other words, your assumption is correct.