I have a situation where I'm refactoring old code, taking apart an old monster project and splitting it (for various reasons) into smaller sub projects. One project is going to end up containing mostly interfaces while their associated implementations are in another project, and I'm not sure about the best way of setting up the package structure.
Should I go for
org.company.interfaceproject.util.InterfaceClass and
org.company.implementationproject.util.ImplementationClass
or
org.company.project.util.InterfaceClass and
org.company.project.util.ImplementationClass
where the first implementation has the advantage of pointing out to which project the files belong, while the second on doesn't mix in the fact that the files are in different projects at all.
I guess there is no right and wrong here, but I'm curious if anybody has any opinions on the matter.
Yes you need to just come up with a naming convention. Usually a combination of both has suited our company to avoid ambiguity. For example, say you had an interface:
org.company.service.UserService
Then, we would use the following for the implementation class that was wired by, or had, spring dependencies:
org.company.service.spring.UserServiceImpl
This then has the best of both viewpoints:
UserService
, and still distinguishable even when both packages are imported.