I have the following code:
#include <span>
int* pointers[3];
std::span<const int* const> s = pointers;
GCC accepts this, but Clang (compiling libstdc++) rejects it, stating:
<source>:4:29: error: no viable conversion from 'int *[3]' to 'std::span<const int *const>'
4 | std::span<const int* const> s = pointers;
| ^ ~~~~~~~~
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15.0.0/../../../../include/c++/15.0.0/span:230:7: note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from 'int *[3]' to 'const span<const int *const> &' for 1st argument
230 | span(const span&) noexcept = default;
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15.0.0/../../../../include/c++/15.0.0/span:192:2: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'const int *' against 'int *'
192 | span(type_identity_t<element_type> (&__arr)[_ArrayExtent]) noexcept
| ^
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15.0.0/../../../../include/c++/15.0.0/span:199:2: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'array<_Tp, _ArrayExtent>' against 'int *[3]'
199 | span(array<_Tp, _ArrayExtent>& __arr) noexcept
| ^
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15.0.0/../../../../include/c++/15.0.0/span:206:2: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'array<_Tp, _ArrayExtent>' against 'int *[3]'
206 | span(const array<_Tp, _ArrayExtent>& __arr) noexcept
| ^
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15.0.0/../../../../include/c++/15.0.0/span:218:2: note: candidate template ignored: constraints not satisfied [with _Range = int *(&)[3]]
218 | span(_Range&& __range)
| ^
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15.0.0/../../../../include/c++/15.0.0/span:213:8: note: because '!is_array_v<remove_cvref_t<int *(&)[3]> >' evaluated to false
213 | && (!is_array_v<remove_cvref_t<_Range>>)
| ^
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15.0.0/../../../../include/c++/15.0.0/span:238:2: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'span<_OType, _OExtent>' against 'int *[3]'
238 | span(const span<_OType, _OExtent>& __s) noexcept
| ^
I was under the impression that std::span
can be constructed from ranges if only a qualification conversion (such as int*
to const int * const
) is required, so which compiler is correct here?
This is quite likely just a Clang/GCC interoperability quirk, considering that the code also compiles with -stdlib=libc++
.
Barry's reduced example shows the relevant difference between Clang and GCC:
#include <cstddef>
template <size_t N>
void f(const int* const (&)[N]);
int main() {
int* pointers[3];
f(pointers); // accepted by GCC, rejected by Clang
}
This deduction is governed by [temp.deduct.call]. According to p3
[...] If
P
is a reference type, the type referred to byP
is used for type deduction.
Here, P
is the parameter type, const int* const (&)[N]
, so it is replaced by const int* const [N]
.
Then, p4 instructs as follows:
In general, the deduction process attempts to find template argument values that will make the deduced
A
identical toA
(after the typeA
is transformed as described above). However, there are three cases that allow a difference:
- If the original
P
is a reference type, the deducedA
(i.e., the type referred to by the reference) can be more cv-qualified than the transformedA
.- The transformed
A
can be another pointer or pointer-to-member type that can be converted to the deducedA
via a function pointer conversion and/or qualification conversion.- [...]
The "deduced A
" means P
after template arguments have been substituted. So in other words the compiler will try to deduce N
that makes const int* const [N]
identical to the argument type, int* [3]
. Obviously that is not possible, so we need to check if one of the bullets allows the deduction to succeed.
The original P
is a reference type, so the deduced A
could be more cv-qualified than A
, that is, the deduced A
could be int* const [3]
. But arguably const int* const [3]
is not allowed by this bullet because that type is not just more cv-qualified than int* [3]
; it has "deep const" added to it as well.
The second bullet also doesn't apply here because the "transformed A
" is the original A
, the type int* [3]
. According to p2, A
is transformed if the original P
is not a reference type. Such a transformation would have made A
into int**
. But since the original P
was a reference type, the transformations don't occur. That means the second bullet here doesn't apply because the transformed A
is not a pointer type, it's still the original type int* [3]
. The second bullet would apply to a case such as
template <class T>
void g(const T*);
int main() { int* p = nullptr; g(p); }
In Barry's example, Clang is right according to the letter of the law but I think GCC is right according to the spirit. It seems that this case falls into a gap in the wording but there is no reason why I would expect it to be rejected, given that this reference binding (if the deduction were to succeed) would be analogous to a qualification conversion (see [over.ics.ref]/1.3). I think this should be reported as a CWG issue.