I am not trying to accomplish anything except understand why this specific regex does not work as intended:
/\bty(?!t)\b/i
Intended match:
From what I understood about negative lookbehind, it should match something not followed by something, and here i want to match tyX (X can be any character) as long as X is not 't'.
Should match:
tya
Should not match:
tyt
Using a negated set solves this easily, but I don't understand why a negative lookahead doesn't work.
From what I understood about negative lookbehind, it should match something not followed by something, and here i want to match tyX (X can be any character) as long as X is not 't'.
(?!t)
is not a negative look behind, but a negative look ahead. You got that right further on in your question.(?!t)
asserts that there is no t
at this position, without moving the current position.\bty(?!t)\b
cannot match tyX
, as your regex requires a \b
immediately after ty
. There is no provision for a third character in this pattern.\b
asserts that the next character is not an alphanumerical, which already excludes "t", and so your regex is actually doing the same as \bty\b
and so only the word ty
can be matched (case insensitive).To provide for longer words, you should add \w*
after ty
. To exclude words ending in a "t", you could use a negative look behind so to assert that the last character matched is not a "t":
\bty\w*(?<!t)\b
This will match all of the following:
ty
typ
type
typical
tyranny
typesetting
It will not match:
typeset
tyrant
typist
typescript
typologist