Here's some code I've been experimenting with:
print "\e[?1003h"
begin
loop do
begin
input = ARGF.read_nonblock(1024)
puts "input: #{input.inspect}"
rescue IO::EAGAINWaitReadable
end
end
ensure
print "\e[?1003l"
end
When I run this code, I can see content like this being printed to the terminal, but none of it indicates it's being sent to ARGF
. I've tried STDIN
as well. My read_nonblock
calls always raise IO::EAGAINWaitReadable
, which seems to be the expected behavior (see spec).
^[[MCn@^[[MCn?^[[MCn>^[[MCm>^[[MCm=^[[MCk;^[[MCk:^[[MCj:^[[MCi:^[[MCh:^[[MCg:^[[MCe:^[[MCd:^[[MCc:^[[MCb;^[[MCb<^[[MCc<^[[MCd<^[[MCe<^[[MCf<^[[MCg<^[[MCg;^[[MCf;^[[MCf:^[[MCe:^[[MCd:^[[MCd;^[[MCd<^[[MCe<^[[MCf<^[[MCg<^[[MCg;^[[MCg<^[[MCg;^[[MCf;^[[MCf:^[[MCe:^[[MCd:^[[MCd;^[[MCe;^[[MCe<^[[MCe;^[[MCf;^[[MCe;^[[MCe:^[[MCe;^[[MCf;^[[MCe;^[[MCd;^[[MCd<^[[MCe<^[[MCe=^[[MCf=^[[MCf<^[[MCe<^[[MCe;^[[MCd;^[[MCc;^[[MCc<^[[MCd<^[[MCe<^[[MCe;^[[MCe<^[[MCf<^[[MCf;^[[MCe;^[[MCd;^[[MCd<^[[MCe<^[[MCe=^[[MCf=^[[MCg=^[[MCh=^[[MCi>^[[MCj>^[[MCk>^[[MCl>^[[MCn?^[[MCpA^[[MCqB^[[MCrC^[[MCrD^[[MCsD^[[MCsE^[[MCtF^[[MCsG^[[MCrG^[[MCqG^[[MCpG^[[MCpH^[[MCmH^[[MCmG^[[MClG^[[MCgI^[[MCfI^[[MCeI^[[MC]I^[[MC\I^[[MC[I
If you want to do your own processing, you have to capture the characters in raw
mode.
This should work: (I've tried to keep your code structure)
require 'io/console'
at_exit { print "\e[?1003l" }
print "\e[?1003h"
STDIN.raw(intr: true) do # raw mode but allow ctrl-c
loop do
begin
input = STDIN.read_nonblock(1024)
p input: input
rescue IO::EAGAINWaitReadable
IO.select([STDIN])
retry
end
end
end
Output: (while moving the mouse)
$ ruby mouse.rb
{:input=>"\e[MCYB"}
{:input=>"\e[MCZB"}
{:input=>"\e[MC[B"}
{:input=>"\e[MC\\A"}
{:input=>"\e[MC]A"}
{:input=>"\e[MC]B"}
{:input=>"\e[MC\\B"}
Of course, you still have to actually process that mouse input in a meaningful way.