I've been learning about command line expansions and substitution, including path name expansion and command substitution. In my studies, I came across the concept of controlling these expansions using double quotes. While experimenting with these concepts, I encountered a behavior that I'm having trouble interpreting.
When I use the command echo $(cal)
, the output seems to ignore the newlines and is displayed as a single line:
August 2023 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 ...
However, when I use double quotes like this: echo "$(cal)"
, the output is correctly formatted with newlines:
August 2023
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
From my understanding, using double quotes appears to render the newline characters (\n
) correctly in the echo "$(cal)"
command.
However, what confuses me is that when I try a similar approach with other characters, such as A\nB
, using the command echo "A\nB"
, the output does not interpret the newline character and instead displays it as literal text:
A\nB
I discovered that I need to use the -e
switch, like this: echo -e "A\nB"
, to achieve the expected behavior:
A
B
Could someone please explain why the behavior differs between these two cases? Why does echo "$(cal)"
correctly interpret newline characters within double quotes, while echo "A\nB"
requires the -e
switch for the correct interpretation?
I appreciate any insights or clarifications you can provide. Thank you!
There are no newline characters in "A\nB"
. C-style escape sequences aren't interpreted inside single quotes or double quotes. Backslash can be used in double-quoted strings to escape special characters like $
so they're treated literally, but \n
has no special meaning and is interpreted literally.
To make a string using C-style escape sequences, use $'string'
.
echo $'A\nB'
will print
A
B
The -e
option to echo
tells the echo
command to interpret escape sequences inside the string when it's printing.