I like to control the thread execution when using streams with a thread pool. Currently I have List of string
List<String> mylist = new ArrayList() {"1","2","3","4"}; //that holds the strings
List<Action> actions = new ArrayList<>{} // holds function that manipulate the strings from mylist
Each action have work method that get the String from mylist.
Stream<String> stream = mylist.parallelStream();
stream = stream.flatMap(s-> actions.stream().map(ac -> ac.work(str)));
r = stream.collect(Collectors.toList());
All work great but I have no control on the thread pool, know I can use ForkJoinPool as in this example:
But I didn't found way to implement it in my example. This for example doesn't work:
ForkJoinPool customThreadPool = new ForkJoinPool(4);
r= customThreadPool.submit(
() -> mylist.parallelStream().flatMap(s-> actions.stream().map(ac -> ac.work(str))).collect(Collectors.toList()));
gives me error:
java: incompatible types: no instance(s) of type variable(s) T,R,A,capture#1 of ?,T exist so that java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask<T> conforms to java.util.List<java.lang.String>
The code compiles and runs fine, once the code errors are fixed (str
=> s
).
Common Pool
// Setup with dummy actions for testing which thread executes the action
List<String> mylist = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList("1","2","3","4")); //that holds the strings
List<Action> actions = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(
s -> { s += "x"; System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ": " + s); return s; },
s -> { s += "y"; System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ": " + s); return s; }
));
// Using common pool
Stream<String> stream = mylist.parallelStream();
stream = stream.flatMap(s -> actions.stream().map(ac -> ac.work(s)));
List<String> r = stream.collect(Collectors.toList());
System.out.println(r);
Output
ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-7: 1x
ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-3: 2x
ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-3: 2y
main: 3x
ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-5: 4x
main: 3y
ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-7: 1y
ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-5: 4y
[1x, 1y, 2x, 2y, 3x, 3y, 4x, 4y]
Custom Pool
ForkJoinPool customThreadPool = new ForkJoinPool(4);
ForkJoinTask<List<String>> task = customThreadPool.submit(
() -> mylist.parallelStream().flatMap(s -> actions.stream().map(ac -> ac.work(s))).collect(Collectors.toList()));
System.out.println(task.get());
If the compiler complains as described in the question, you need to help it choose the correct overload of submit()
by casting the lambda expression in the 3rd line:
(Callable<List<String>>) () -> mylist.parallelStream().flatMap(s -> actions.stream().map(ac -> ac.work(s))).collect(Collectors.toList()));
Output
ForkJoinPool-1-worker-3: 3x
ForkJoinPool-1-worker-1: 1x
ForkJoinPool-1-worker-1: 1y
ForkJoinPool-1-worker-5: 2x
ForkJoinPool-1-worker-7: 4x
ForkJoinPool-1-worker-7: 4y
ForkJoinPool-1-worker-5: 2y
ForkJoinPool-1-worker-3: 3y
[1x, 1y, 2x, 2y, 3x, 3y, 4x, 4y]
Single Thread
Stream<String> stream = mylist.stream();
stream = stream.flatMap(s -> actions.stream().map(ac -> ac.work(s)));
List<String> r = stream.collect(Collectors.toList());
System.out.println(r);
Output
main: 1x
main: 1y
main: 2x
main: 2y
main: 3x
main: 3y
main: 4x
main: 4y
[1x, 1y, 2x, 2y, 3x, 3y, 4x, 4y]