I'm studying helm3 and k8s (microk8s). While tryingi the following command:
helm install traefik traefik/traefik -n traefik --values traefik-values.yaml
and traefik-values.yaml has the following value:
additionalArguments:
- "--certificatesresolvers.letsencrypt.acme.email=<my-email>"
- "--certificatesresolvers.letsencrypt.acme.storage=/data/acme.json"
- "--certificatesresolvers.letsencrypt.acme.caserver=https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory"
- "--certificatesResolvers.letsencrypt.acme.tlschallenge=true"
- "--api.insecure=true"
- "--accesslog=true"
- "--log.level=INFO"
hostNetwork: true
ipaddress: <my-ip>
service:
type: ClusterIP
ports:
web:
port: 80
websecure:
port: 443
I receive this bind-permission error
traefik.go:76: command traefik error: error while building entryPoint web: error preparing server: error opening listener: listen tcp :80: bind: permission denied
on the other hand, I can install Traefik on the same ports (80 and 443) using the following yaml
file (approximately the example on Traefik's site):
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: traefik
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: traefik-ingress-controller
namespace: traefik
---
kind: DaemonSet
apiVersion: apps/v1
metadata:
name: traefik-ingress-controller
namespace: traefik
labels:
k8s-app: traefik-ingress-lb
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
k8s-app: traefik-ingress-lb
name: traefik-ingress-lb
template:
metadata:
labels:
k8s-app: traefik-ingress-lb
name: traefik-ingress-lb
spec:
tolerations:
- effect: NoSchedule
operator: Exists
serviceAccountName: traefik-ingress-controller
terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 60
hostNetwork: true
containers:
- image: traefik:2.4
name: traefik-ingress-lb
ports:
- name: http
containerPort: 80
hostPort: 80
# - name: admin
# containerPort: 8080
# hostPort: 8080
securityContext:
capabilities:
drop:
- ALL
add:
- NET_BIND_SERVICE
args:
- --providers.kubernetesingress=true
# you need to manually set this IP to the incoming public IP
# that your ingress resources would use. Note it only affects
# status and kubectl UI, and doesn't really do anything
# It could even be left out https://github.com/containous/traefik/issues/6303
- --providers.kubernetesingress.ingressendpoint.ip=<my-server-ip>
## uncomment these and the ports above and below to enable
## the web UI on the host NIC port 8080 in **insecure** mode
- --api.dashboard=true
- --api.insecure=true
- --log=true
- --log.level=INFO
- --accesslog=true
- --entrypoints.web.address=:80
- --entrypoints.websecure.address=:443
- --certificatesresolvers.leresolver.acme.tlschallenge=true # <== Enable TLS-ALPN-01 to generate and renew ACME certs
- --certificatesresolvers.leresolver.acme.email=<email> # <== Setting email for certs
- --certificatesresolvers.leresolver.acme.storage=/data/acme.json # <== Defining acme file to store cert information
---
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: traefik-ingress-service
namespace: traefik
spec:
selector:
k8s-app: traefik-ingress-lb
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
name: web
# - protocol: TCP
# port: 8080
# name: admin
---
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: traefik-ingress-controller
rules:
- apiGroups:
- ""
resources:
- services
- endpoints
- secrets
verbs:
- get
- list
- watch
- apiGroups:
- extensions
resources:
- ingresses
verbs:
- get
- list
- watch
---
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: traefik-ingress-controller
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: traefik-ingress-controller
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: traefik-ingress-controller
namespace: traefik
The two specs are not identical but quite similar as far as I can understand. They both create a ServiceAccount in the 'traefik' namespace and grant a ClusterRole.
What part determines the permission on port 80?
There's an open issue on the Traefik helm chart where Jasper Ben suggests a working solution:
hostNetwork: true
ports:
web:
port: 80
redirectTo: websecure
websecure:
port: 443
securityContext:
capabilities:
drop: [ALL]
add: [NET_BIND_SERVICE]
readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
runAsGroup: 0
runAsNonRoot: false
runAsUser: 0
The missing part in the helm chart is NET_BIND_SERVICE
capability in the securityContext.