The cond
-expression in Scheme is a special form, but is the else
keyword, used as final case in a cond
-expression, a special form? Or is it just a reserved keyword that is essentially equivalent to the truth-value #t ?
In the latter case, why cannot I write something like (?eq else #t)
?
The Scheme standards call else
, as used in a cond
form, auxiliary syntax. R6RS shows one possible implementation of cond
using syntax-rules
; here else
is called a <literal>:
(define-syntax cond
(syntax-rules (else =>)
((cond (else result1 result2 ...))
(begin result1 result2 ...))
;; ...
Note that else
is not a replacement for #t
. A <literal> is an identifier that is used to match input subforms; it is treated as a syntactic keyword within the syntax-rules
form.