Consider the following TypeScript code:
type operator<T> = (input:T) => T
const pipe = <T>(...operators:operator<T>[]) => (input:T):T => operators.reduce((output, f) => f(output), input)
const add2:operator<number> = x => x+2
const times3:operator<number> = x => x*3
console.log(pipe(add2, times3)(1)) //output 9
The pipe function simply pipes the input of one operator into the result of the next operator.
Now consider this new definition of the operator type:
type operator<T, U> = (input:T) => U
How should the pipe function be rewritten in order for the IDE to let me know if I am using the types correctly?
E.g.: consider these two operators:
const times3:operator<number, number> = x => x*3
const toStr:operator<number, string> = x => `${x}`
I would like this to work properly:
pipe(times3, toStr)(1)
And here I would like the IDE to warn me that the types are wrong:
pipe(toStr, times3)(1)
I can't figure this out, thank in advance.
Here is how RxJS does it:
pipe(): Observable<T>;
pipe<A>(op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>): Observable<A>;
pipe<A, B>(op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>, op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>): Observable<B>;
pipe<A, B, C>(op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>, op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>, op3: OperatorFunction<B, C>): Observable<C>;
pipe<A, B, C, D>(
op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>,
op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>,
op3: OperatorFunction<B, C>,
op4: OperatorFunction<C, D>
): Observable<D>;
pipe<A, B, C, D, E>(
op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>,
op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>,
op3: OperatorFunction<B, C>,
op4: OperatorFunction<C, D>,
op5: OperatorFunction<D, E>
): Observable<E>;
pipe<A, B, C, D, E, F>(
op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>,
op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>,
op3: OperatorFunction<B, C>,
op4: OperatorFunction<C, D>,
op5: OperatorFunction<D, E>,
op6: OperatorFunction<E, F>
): Observable<F>;
pipe<A, B, C, D, E, F, G>(
op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>,
op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>,
op3: OperatorFunction<B, C>,
op4: OperatorFunction<C, D>,
op5: OperatorFunction<D, E>,
op6: OperatorFunction<E, F>,
op7: OperatorFunction<F, G>
): Observable<G>;
pipe<A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H>(
op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>,
op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>,
op3: OperatorFunction<B, C>,
op4: OperatorFunction<C, D>,
op5: OperatorFunction<D, E>,
op6: OperatorFunction<E, F>,
op7: OperatorFunction<F, G>,
op8: OperatorFunction<G, H>
): Observable<H>;
pipe<A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I>(
op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>,
op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>,
op3: OperatorFunction<B, C>,
op4: OperatorFunction<C, D>,
op5: OperatorFunction<D, E>,
op6: OperatorFunction<E, F>,
op7: OperatorFunction<F, G>,
op8: OperatorFunction<G, H>,
op9: OperatorFunction<H, I>
): Observable<I>;
pipe<A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I>(
op1: OperatorFunction<T, A>,
op2: OperatorFunction<A, B>,
op3: OperatorFunction<B, C>,
op4: OperatorFunction<C, D>,
op5: OperatorFunction<D, E>,
op6: OperatorFunction<E, F>,
op7: OperatorFunction<F, G>,
op8: OperatorFunction<G, H>,
op9: OperatorFunction<H, I>,
...operations: OperatorFunction<any, any>[]
): Observable<unknown>;
It's not pretty, but it gets the job done.