I have 3 tables - Country, Region and CountryRegion.
I want to fetch list of countries when I fetch region. like :
*
{
regionId:11
regionName:"abc"
countries: [
{countryId:"67",
countryName:"us"
},
{...}
]
}
There is no need of CountryRegion table but working with legacy DB.
I have implemented :
package com.example.demo.model;
import javax.persistence.*;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
@Entity
@Table(name = "country")
public class Country {
@Id
@Column(name = "countryid")
private int countryId;
@Column(name = "countryname")
private String countryName;
@OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER, mappedBy = "country")
private List<CountryRegion> regions = new ArrayList<>();
public int getCountryId() {
return countryId;
}
public void setCountryId(int countryId) {
this.countryId = countryId;
}
public String getCountryName() {
return countryName;
}
public void setCountryName(String countryName) {
this.countryName = countryName;
}
public List<CountryRegion> getRegions() {
return regions;
}
public void setRegions(List<CountryRegion> regions) {
this.regions = regions;
}
}
package com.example.demo.model;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonIgnore;
import javax.persistence.*;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
@Entity
@Table(name = "region")
public class Region {
@Id
@Column(name = "regionid")
private int regionId;
@Column(name = "regionname")
private String regionName;
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "region")
private List<CountryRegion> countries = new ArrayList<>();
public int getRegionId() {
return regionId;
}
public void setRegionId(int regionId) {
this.regionId = regionId;
}
public String getRegionName() {
return regionName;
}
public void setRegionName(String regionName) {
this.regionName = regionName;
}
public List<CountryRegion> getCountries() {
return countries;
}
public void setCountries(List<CountryRegion> countries) {
this.countries = countries;
}
}
package com.example.demo.model;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonBackReference;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonIgnore;
import javax.persistence.*;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.List;
@Entity
@Table(name = "countryregion1")
public class CountryRegion implements Serializable {
@Id @ManyToOne
@JoinColumn(name = "regionid", referencedColumnName = "regionId")
private Region region;
@Id @ManyToOne
@JoinColumn(name = "countryid", referencedColumnName = "countryId")
private Country country;
public Region getRegion() {
return this.region;
}
public void setRegion(Region region) {
this.region = null;
}
public Country getCountry() {
return this.country;
}
public void setCountry(Country country) {
this.country = country;
}
}
package com.example.demo.dao;
import com.example.demo.model.Country;
import org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Repository;
import java.util.List;
@Repository
public interface CountryRepository extends CrudRepository<Country, Integer> {
@Override
List<Country> findAll();
}
package com.example.demo.dao;
import com.example.demo.model.Country;
import com.example.demo.model.Region;
import org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Repository;
import java.util.List;
@Repository
public interface RegionRepository extends CrudRepository<Region, Integer> {
@Override
List<Region> findAll();
}
There is something wrong in code above as I only want to fetch list of countries(or Region in case country)
This code is causing a infinite loop in JSON. Tried Json Ignore etc. but in that case i am not getting any value in lists.
TIA !!
first of all you should specify the relation between Country and Region. I think you dont need to define CountryRegion class.if the relation is ManyToMany then you can use below code in Region class :
@ManyToMany(cascade = { CascadeType.ALL })
@JoinTable(
name = "Employee_Project",
joinColumns = { @JoinColumn(name = "regionid") },
inverseJoinColumns = { @JoinColumn(name = "countryid") }
)
Set<Country > countries = new HashSet<>();
and if it is OneToMany the raltion that you implement in Region class is enough. but i think you want ManyToMany corresponding to your wish