Is std::numeric_limits<float>::is_iec559
+ std::numeric_limits<float>::digits == 24
enough to ensure(1) that float
is binary32(2) in IEEE 754 ? Same for double with ... digits == 53 ?
Edit : + std::numeric_limits<float>::max_exponent - 1 == 127
Edit : Are there any other ways ? If yes, which one is "the best" ?
You can use traits class to check your representation matches some expectations.
Here are the traits used to test your representation:
namespace num {
template <std::size_t N> struct ieee754_traits;
template <> struct ieee754_traits<4> {
using unsigned_type = uint32_t;
static constexpr std::size_t sign_size = 1;
static constexpr std::size_t exp_size = 8;
static constexpr std::size_t mant_size = 23;
static constexpr std::size_t exp_shift = 127;
static constexpr int32_t exp_mask = 0xFF;
static constexpr unsigned_type mant_mask = 0x7FFFFF;
};
template <> struct ieee754_traits<8> {
using unsigned_type = uint64_t;
static constexpr std::size_t sign_size = 1;
static constexpr std::size_t exp_size = 11;
static constexpr std::size_t mant_size = 52;
static constexpr std::size_t exp_shift = 1023;
static constexpr int32_t exp_mask = 0x7FF;
static constexpr unsigned_type mant_mask = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
};
template<typename T>
constexpr bool check_ieee754() {
// add more check here
return std::numeric_limits<T>::digits == (num::ieee754_traits<sizeof(T)>::mant_size + 1) &&
std::numeric_limits<T>::max_exponent == (num::ieee754_traits<sizeof(T)>::exp_mask - num::ieee754_traits<sizeof(T)>::exp_shift);
}
}
Then, you can check your representation:
static_assert(sizeof(float) == 4 && sizeof(double) == 8);
static_assert(num::check_ieee754<float>(), "does not match ieee754");
static_assert(num::check_ieee754<double>(), "does not match ieee754");