Why this scala code
case class Foo[T]() {
def bar(tt: T): Unit = ???
def bar_(s: String)(implicit ev : T =:= String): Unit = bar(s)
}
triggers this compilation error
[error] type mismatch;
[error] found : s.type (with underlying type String)
[error] required: T
[error] def foo2(s: String)(implicit ev: T =:= String) = foo(s)
The thing is that you need evidence String =:= T
rather than T =:= String
.
case class Foo[T]() {
def bar(tt: T): Unit = ???
def bar_(s: String)(implicit ev : String =:= T): Unit = bar(s)
}
=:=
is not symmetric.
https://typelevel.org/blog/2014/07/02/type_equality_to_leibniz.html
See also cats.evidence.Is
, scalaz.Leibniz
.
In scala 2.13 you can also do
def bar_(s: String)(implicit ev : T =:= String): Unit = {
implicit val ev1 = ev.flip
bar(s)
}