Bridge pattern in java without abstract class

I am trying to learn Bridge pattern. So far every page I have referred to, has one abstraction as interface and other as abstract class. Abstract class holds a reference to interface. I was wondering, if I replace abstract class with interface and have a reference of second interface in each impl class, would that still make sense in context of Bridge pattern.

Solution

If you move the composition relationship from the abstract class down to its implementation, then you have an Adapter rather than a Bridge.

If you have multiple Adapters all composing a common interface, then it probably makes sense to pull that composition relationship up to an abstraction, i.e. a Bridge again.