I know it is theoretically undefined behavior and of course bad style. This is the example of a school (I am not the pupil). But why do I get 7 (example a) resp. 1 (example b) out of this operation:
Online example: https://onlinegdb.com/B172lj8k8
a:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int i = 2;
printf("%d; i=%d", ++i + i++, i);
return 0;
}
b:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int i = 2;
printf("%d; i=%d", ++i - i++, i);
return 0;
}
In my opinion the output should be 6 and 2.
The other example should be 4 - 2.
Exexcuting the increment in a statement seems to yield the result of the increment immediately, no matter if it is postfix or prefix, which is odd. Or do I get it wrong totally?
The order in which the arguments passed to a function are evaluated is not specified, and the order of evaluating the operants of +
is unspecified, too.
So in printf("%d %d", i+1, i-1)
, for example, you cannot rely on the order of evaluation of the arguments; i+1
might be evaluated after i-1
, actually; You will not recognise, since the evaluation of the one does not effect the result of the other.
In conjunction with "side effects" like the post-increment i++
, however, the effect of incrementing i
at a specific point in time might influence the result of other evaluations based on i
. Therefore, it is "undefined behaviour" in C, if a variable is used more than once in an expression and a side effect changes its value (formally, to be precise, if there is no sequence point in between).