As per my understanding the effect of the overloaded postfix operator on a variable would be reflected in the next occurrence of the variable.
But the below program contradicts my understanding,
Please help me in understanding what is happening in the below program.
#include <iostream>
typedef struct Rectangle_Tag
{
int len;
int breadth;
}Rectangle_S;
/* Overloading an infix opertor */
Rectangle_S operator+(Rectangle_S a, Rectangle_S b)
{
Rectangle_S c;
c.len = a.len + b.len;
c.breadth = a.breadth + b.breadth;
return c;
}
/* Overloading a prefix opertor */
Rectangle_S operator++(Rectangle_S &a)
{
a.len += 1;
a.breadth += 1;
return a;
}
/* Overloading a postfix opertor */
Rectangle_S operator++(Rectangle_S &a, int val)
{
a.len += 1;
a.breadth += 1;
return a;
}
int main(void)
{
Rectangle_S r1, r2, r3;
r1.len = 20;
r1.breadth = 10;
r2.len = 20;
r2.breadth = 10;
r3 = (r1++) + (r2);
std::cout << "\tr3.len : " << r3.len << '\n';
std::cout << "\tr3.breadth : " << r3.breadth << '\n';
return (0);
}
//Expected Output :
r3.len : 40
r3.breadth : 20
//Actual Output :
r3.len : 41
r3.breadth : 21
Nobody's perfect!
The author of the code has implemented the postfix operator in an idiosyncratic way. A correct way is
Rectangle_S operator++(Rectangle_S &a, int)
{
auto old = a;
++a;
return old;
}
Note too that the prefix ++
should return the modified object by reference.