I used Jaxb to generate a Jar file from xsd:
CustomObject inputRequest = xmlMapper.readValue(input, CustomObject.class);
The error message I am getting is:
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: Multiple fields representing property "PS": OrderLineType#pS vs OrderLineType#pSV5 at [Source: (StringReader); line: 1, column: 1]
And my class is:
@XmlElement(name = "PS", namespace = "financetypes:defn:v4")
protected financetypes.v4.PSType pS;
@XmlElement(name = "PS", namespace = "financetypes:defn:v5")
protected financetypes.v5.PSType pSV5;
They have the same name, but different namespace.
Is xmlmapper able to handle XmlElement that has the same name and different namespace?
If yes, how do I fix this? If no, what should I do?
I am building jar file from jenkin. Is there a plugin that I can use to fix this issue?
Thanks!
here is my xsd v4.xsd
<!--Begin Definition: Complex Type: PriceStructureType-->
<xs:complexType name="PriceStructureType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="PriceModel" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Will be required in future...
TODO: Add valid items...
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element ref="finance:SourceSystemPrice" minOccurs="0">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Will be required in future...
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="ComponentPrice" type="finance:ComponentListType" minOccurs="0">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Will be required in future...
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name="PriceStructure" type="finance:PriceStructureType"/>
<!--End Definition: Complex Type: PriceStructureType-->
v5.xsd
<!--Begin Definition: Complex Type: PriceStructureType-->
<xs:complexType name="PriceStructureType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="PriceModel" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Will be required in future...
TODO: Add valid items...
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element ref="finance:SourceSystemPrice" minOccurs="0">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Will be required in future...
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="ComponentPrice" type="finance:ComponentListType" minOccurs="0">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
Will be required in future...
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name="PriceStructure" type="finance:PriceStructureType"/>
<!--End Definition: Complex Type: PriceStructureType-->
common.xsd
xmlns:finance="urn:financetypes:defn:v4"
xmlns:finance_v5="urn:financetypes:defn:v5"
<xs:import namespace="urn:financetypes:defn:v4" schemaLocation="financetypes.v4.xsd"/>
<xs:import namespace="urn:financetypes:defn:v5" schemaLocation="financetypes.v5.xsd"/>
<xs:choice>
<xs:element ref="finance:PriceStructure" minOccurs="0">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation xml:lang="en">
Price Structure itemizes the price components of this OrderLine. Pricing
is a integral part of the Sales Order record.
This should be a required element for a sales order, but it is marked
as optional for backward compatibility.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element ref="finance_v5:PriceStructure" minOccurs="0">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation xml:lang="en">
Price Structure itemizes the price components of this OrderLine. Pricing
is a integral part of the Sales Order record.
This should be a required element for a sales order, but it is marked
as optional for backward compatibility.
</xs:documentation>
<xs:appinfo>
<jaxb:property name="PriceStructureV5"/>
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:choice>
You could do this. For a root class containing these 2 elements:
@XmlRootElement(name = "root")
@XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
public class Root {
@XmlElement(name = "PS", namespace = "financetypes:defn:v4")
protected financetypes.v4.PSType pS;
@XmlElement(name = "PS", namespace = "financetypes:defn:v5")
protected financetypes.v5.PSType pSV5;
}
You can create you classes with the different versions like this:
@XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
@XmlType(name = "v4PS", namespace = "financetypes:defn:v4")
public class PSType {
@XmlValue
private String value;
}
and:
@XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
@XmlType(name = "v5PS", namespace = "financetypes:defn:v5")
public class PSType {
@XmlValue
private String value;
}
For a sample xml as below:
<root xmlns:v4="financetypes:defn:v4" xmlns:v5="financetypes:defn:v5">
<v4:PS>version 4</v4:PS>
<v5:PS>version 5</v5:PS>
</root>
You will be able to unmarshall properly.
Update to respond to the comment:
You use xsd to generate the classes. You did not provide the xsd so I will assume you are not allowed to. I created an xsd to generate the classes you show in your question. The namespace.xsd looks like this:
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:v4="financetypes:defn:v4" xmlns:v5="financetypes:defn:v5">
<xs:element name="root">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:all>
<xs:element name="v4PSType" type="PSTypev4" />
<xs:element name="v5PSType" type="PSTypev5" />
</xs:all>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:complexType name="PSTypev4">
<xs:simpleContent>
<xs:extension base="xs:string" />
</xs:simpleContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="PSTypev5">
<xs:simpleContent>
<xs:extension base="xs:string" />
</xs:simpleContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
Then your bindings would be:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<jaxb:bindings version="2.0" xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb"
xmlns:xjc="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb/xjc"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:annox="http://annox.dev.java.net"
jaxb:extensionBindingPrefixes="xjc">
<jaxb:bindings schemaLocation="../xsd/namespaces.xsd">
<jaxb:bindings node="//xs:complexType[@name='PSTypev4']">
<annox:annotate target = "class">
<annox:annotate annox:class="javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlType" name="v4PSType" namespace="financetypes:defn:v4" />
</annox:annotate>
</jaxb:bindings>
<jaxb:bindings node="//xs:complexType[@name='PSTypev5']">
<annox:annotate target = "class">
<annox:annotate annox:class="javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlType" name="v5PSType" namespace="financetypes:defn:v5" />
</annox:annotate>
</jaxb:bindings>
<jaxb:bindings node="//xs:element[@name='root']//xs:complexType//xs:all//xs:element[@name='v5PSType']">
<annox:annotate target = "field">
<annox:annotate annox:class="javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlElement" name="PS" namespace="financetypes:defn:v5" />
</annox:annotate>
</jaxb:bindings>
<jaxb:bindings node="//xs:element[@name='root']//xs:complexType//xs:all//xs:element[@name='v4PSType']">
<annox:annotate target = "field">
<annox:annotate annox:class="javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlElement" name="PS" namespace="financetypes:defn:v4" />
</annox:annotate>
</jaxb:bindings>
</jaxb:bindings>
</jaxb:bindings>
And then you would end up with classes as those in my answer.