I tried to create a minimal example as it is possible with templates.
(MSVC15, c++14)
There are 2 questions may be connected with each other.
_limited_int_ptr_container _intIndexes
{
// _startIntIndex
// create indexes???
std::make_shared<_limited_int_>(_startIntIndex), // 10060u _startStrIndex
//std::make_shared<_limited_int_>(_startIntIndex + 1),
//std::make_shared<_limited_int_>(_startIntIndex + 2),
//...
std::make_shared<_limited_int_>(_startIntIndex + _maxIntIndexes -1)
};
template <class T, size_t Size>
using _container = const std::array<T, Size>;
template <class T>
using _ptr = std::shared_ptr<T>;
// is it possible to combine this 2 types and use _maxStrIndexes only once?
using _limited_str_ = IndexStr<_maxStrIndexes>;
using _limited_str_ptr = _ptr<_limited_str_>;
using _limited_str_ptr_container = _container<_limited_str_ptr, _maxStrIndexes>;
#include <iostream>
#include <memory>
#include <array>
template<class T, size_t MaxIndex>
class BaseIndex
{
public:
virtual ~BaseIndex() = default;
explicit BaseIndex(const size_t index)
: _maxIndex(MaxIndex), _currentIndex(index) {}
virtual void DoSmth() = 0;
friend std::ostream & operator << (std::ostream & ss, BaseIndex & base_index)
{
ss << "Max: " << base_index._maxIndex << ". Current: " << base_index._currentIndex << std::endl;
return ss;
}
protected:
const size_t _maxIndex;
size_t _currentIndex{ 0u };
};
template<size_t MaxIndex>
class IndexStr : public BaseIndex<std::string, MaxIndex>
{
public:
explicit IndexStr(const size_t index) :BaseIndex(index) {}
void DoSmth() override { std::cout << IndexStr::_maxIndex; }
};
template<size_t MaxIndex>
class IndexInt :public BaseIndex<int, MaxIndex>
{
public:
explicit IndexInt(const size_t index) :BaseIndex(index) {}
void DoSmth() override { std::cout << IndexInt::_maxIndex; }
};
class Manager
{
private:
static const size_t _startStrIndex{ 11u };
static const size_t _startIntIndex{ 10060u };
static const size_t _maxStrIndexes{ 5 };
static const size_t _maxIntIndexes{ 120 };
public:
template <class T, size_t Size>
using _container = const std::array<T, Size>;
template <class T>
using _ptr = std::shared_ptr<T>;
// is it possible to combine this 2 types and use _maxStrIndexes only once?
using _limited_str_ = IndexStr<_maxStrIndexes>;
using _limited_str_ptr = _ptr<_limited_str_>;
using _limited_str_ptr_container = _container<_limited_str_ptr, _maxStrIndexes>;
// const std::array<std::shared_ptr<IndexStr<_maxStrIndexes>>, _maxStrIndexes> _strIndexes
_limited_str_ptr_container _strIndexes
{
// _startStrIndex
// create indexes ???
// std::integer_sequence ???
std::make_shared<_limited_str_>(_startStrIndex), // 11 = _startStrIndex
std::make_shared<_limited_str_>(12),
std::make_shared<_limited_str_>(13),
std::make_shared<_limited_str_>(14),
std::make_shared<_limited_str_>(_startStrIndex + _maxStrIndexes - 1)
};
// is it possible to combine this 2 types and use _maxIntIndexes only once?
using _limited_int_ = IndexInt<_maxIntIndexes>;
using _limited_int_ptr = _ptr<_limited_int_>;
using _limited_int_ptr_container = _container<_limited_int_ptr, _maxIntIndexes>;
_limited_int_ptr_container _intIndexes
{
// _startIntIndex
// create indexes???
std::make_shared<_limited_int_>(_startIntIndex), // 10060u _startStrIndex
//...
std::make_shared<_limited_int_>(_startIntIndex + _maxIntIndexes -1)
};
};
template <class T, size_t Size >
void Process(const std::array<std::shared_ptr<T>, Size> _array)
{
for (auto &&baseindex : _array)
std::cout << *baseindex;
}
int main()
{
Manager m;
Process(m._strIndexes);
//Process(m._intIndexes);
return 0;
}
About the first question: yes, it is possible. It is even quite easy provided that you can use C++11 and variadic templates.
To generate a compile-time list of indices, you can use std::make_index_sequence<N>
, which will return a std::index_sequence<0, 1, 2, 3, ..., N-1>
. You can then pattern-match it with the function creating the compile-time array:
template <std::size_t... Ns>
constexpr auto fill_it_at_compile_time_impl(std::index_sequence<Ns...>) {
return std::array<unsigned, sizeof...(Ns)>{ Ns... };
}
template <std::size_t N>
constexpr auto fill_it_at_compile_time() {
return fill_it_at_compile_time_impl(std::make_index_sequence<N>());
}
If you want to add an offset to the index_sequence
members, just do so in the array initialization:
constexpr auto offset = 10u;
template <std::size_t... Ns>
constexpr auto fill_it_at_compile_time_impl(std::index_sequence<Ns...>) {
return std::array<unsigned, sizeof...(Ns)>{ (offset+Ns)... };
}
About the second question:
As far as I understand it, yes, it's possible. First, create a helper struct
to query the index of _limited_str
:
template <typename T>
struct query_max_index;
template <std::size_t N>
struct query_max_index<IndexStr<N>> {
static const auto max_index = N;
};
Then, rather than refering to _maxStrIndexes
directly, you can query it from indirectly from _limited_str_ptr
:
using _limited_str_ = IndexStr<_maxStrIndexes>;
using _limited_str_ptr = _ptr<_limited_str_>;
using _limited_str_ptr_container = _container<_limited_str_ptr, query_max_index<std::decay_t<decltype(*std::declval<_limited_str_ptr>())>>::max_index>;