Search code examples
c++stdgcc4.8gcc7

Was including <random> necessary in GCC 4.8?


I have inherited a C++ project that was written in 2014 and indeed compiles with GCC 4.8. In a particular file, several classes currently found in the <random> header of C++ standard library are instantiated. These include mt19937, random_device, uniform_real_distribution, and normal_distribution.

When I compile this file with GCC 7.3, I get an error saying that these classes are not defined in the std namespace. This error (obviously) goes away when I include <random>.

My question is why this error does not happen in GCC 4.8? Were these classes previously found under a different header?


Solution

  • Standard headers may include other headers. This can be useful when they share an implementation. However, these things can change over time, e.g. when the common parts are refactored to a third (internal) header file.

    Since we don't know exactly how <random> got included indirectly with GCC4.8, we can't be absolutely positive about what happened, but it is not surprising.