I'm trying to use a @NamedQuery
to join two tables, Address
and Division
. There are multiple divisions at the same address. At the moment I have
Division.java:
@Entity
@Table(name="division")
@NamedQuery(name="Division.mailingAddress", query="SELECT d, a from Division d LEFT JOIN d.addresses a")
public class Division implements Serializable{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name="division_id")
private Short divisionId;
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name="division_name")
private String divisionName;
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name="address_id")
private Short addressId;
@OneToMany(mappedBy="divisionMailingAddress")
private List<Address> addresses;
//getters and setters
}
Addresses.java:
@Entity
@Table(name="address")
public class Address implements Serializable{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GeneratedType.IDENTITY)
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name = "address_id")
private Short addressID;
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name = "mailing_address")
private String mailingAddress;
@ManyToOne
private Division divisionMailingAddress;
}
The error I get when I run this is:
Unknown column 't0.DIVISIONMAILINGADDRESS_division_id' in 'on clause'
What I'm trying to get is this line that works in MySQL:
SELECT * FROM (division d join address a on d.address_id = a.address_id);
Currently the JPA is resolving the named query to:
SELECT t1."all columns", t0."all columns" from division t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN address t0 ON (t0.DIVISIONMAILINGADDRESS_division_id = t1.division_id)
What is wrong with what I am doing? Does the JPA want the join coming from the address vs the division? How Do I get the call to be made off of address_id
vs division_id
?
With great assistance here are what the two classes have been changed to accomplish what I had wanted the outcome to be.
Division.java:
@Entity
@Table(name="division")
@NamedQuery(name="Division.mailingAddress", query="SELECT d from Division d LEFT JOIN d.addressesM2O a")
public class Division implements Serializable{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name="division_id")
private Short divisionId;
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name="division_name")
private String divisionName;
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name="address_id")
private Short addressId;
@ManyToOne(targetEntity = Address.java)
@JoinColumn(name = "address_id", updatable=false, insertable=false)
private Address addressesM2O;
//getters and setters
}
Address.java:
@Entity
@Table(name="address")
public class Address implements Serializable{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GeneratedType.IDENTITY)
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name = "address_id")
private Short addressID;
@Basic(optional = false)
@Column(name = "mailing_address")
private String mailingAddress;
@OneToMany(mappedBy="addressesM2O")
private List<Division> divisionO2M;
}
The @NamedQuery
was changed since d
and a
being present made the result list return a list of Object[]
. Which was the object Division
and Address
. Thus is why d
was kept and a
was removed from the @NamedQuery
.
I think the issue is that you are not mentioning the @JoinColumn
while mentioning @ManyToOne
in the Address class , due to which while making the join JPA itself is creating the foreign key DIVISIONMAILINGADDRESS_division_id.
Try to mention ManyToOne relationship in Address class as below and let me know if any issue occurs:
@ManyToOne(targetEntity = Division.class)
@JoinColumn(name= "division_id")//basically the name of the column here should be same as the one mentioned in your database