I'm wondering why I need to declare a default constructor in this case. For one thing doesn't the compiler do that automatically if i leave it out? And regardless, I still don't see why its necessary. Also, I get the error even if I omit 'obj_B = origin.obj_B;'
class B
{
public:
bool theArray[5] ;
B(bool x) {theArray[1] = x;};
//B(){};
};
class A
{
public:
B obj_B;
A() : obj_B(1) {};
A(A const &origin) {obj_B = origin.obj_B;}; //error:no matching function for call
//to B::B()
};
int main ()
{
std::vector <A> someAs;
for(int q=0;q<10;q++)
someAs.push_back(A());
for(int q=0;q<10;q++)
std::cout << someAs[q].obj_B.theArray[1] << std::endl;
}
The compiler only creates a default constructor if you don't specify an alternate constructor.
Because you made:
B(bool x) {theArray[1] = x;}
The default constructor will not be created for you.
The specific error you're getting is because A(A const &origin) doesn't specify the constructor to use for obj_B explicitly.
The following code would work:
A(A const &origin) : obj_B(1) {obj_B = origin.obj_B;}
By the way, you don't need a trailing semicolon on a function definition.