Search code examples
kotlinabstract-classinner-classessealeddata-class

Reference outside the sealed class in Kotlin?


I'm trying to create a class that uses its own state to operate on the state of an external object that it holds a reference to. The external object can be of class A or B, which are similar, but not controlled by the author. So a sealed class is created to access their common attributes, per this earlier answer from @SimY4.

// *** DOES NOT COMPILE ***
class A {   // foreign class whose structure is not modifiable
  val prop get()= "some string made the Class-A way"
}
class B {   // foreign class whose structure is not modifiable
  val prop get()= "some string made the Class-B way"
}
data class ABTool (val obj:AB, val i:Int, val j:Int) {
  // class that manipulates i and j and uses them to do
  // things with AB's "common" attributes through the sealed class AB
  sealed class AB {   // substitute for a common interface
    abstract val prop: String
    abstract val addmagic: String
    data class BoxA(val o:A) : AB() {
      override val prop get()= o.prop
      override val addmagic get() = prop + this@???.magic  // HOW TO REFERENCE?
    }
    data class BoxB(val o:B) : AB() {
      override val prop get()= o.prop
      override val addmagic get() = this@???.magic + prop  // HOW TO REFERENCE?
    }
  }
  val magic get()= "magic: ${i*j}"
}

The problem now is that I've figured out I can't operate on the external object in the way I want, because a sealed class can't refer to its outer class members. Is there a better way to make this work, even if using a different approach (other than sealed class), while:

  • not changing foreign classes A or B;
  • respecting that A and B (and many others in the real case) are similar, so I'm trying to write one tool that calculates and adds magic to A and B with the same code base; and
  • noting that although the ABTool tools are the same, the way they are applied to add magic is slightly different in A vs. B, just as the to access the conceptually common elements of A and B may be different.

Any thoughts on this or a similar workaround? Maybe a more functional approach that I haven't conceived yet?


Solution

  • If ABTool being a sealed class is something you can give up, then here's a solution:

    1. Replace sealed with inner abstract at the ABTool declaration;
    2. Mark BoxA and BoxB as inner as well;

    data class ABTool(val obj: AB, val i: Int, val j: Int) {
        inner abstract class AB {
            abstract val prop: String
            abstract val addmagic: String
    
            inner class BoxA(val o: A) : AB() {
                override val prop get() = o.prop
                override val addmagic get() = prop + magic
            }
    
            inner class BoxB(val o: B) : AB() {
                override val prop get() = o.prop
                override val addmagic get() = magic + prop
            }
        }
    
        val magic get() = "magic: ${i * j}"
    }
    

    (alternatively, instead of marking AB as inner, move BoxA and BoxB out of it to the scope of ABTool)