I have this CSS and looking for a smarter/better way to write this.
daypicker>table>tbody>tr>td>button.btn.btn-sm.btn-secondary,
daypicker>table>tbody>tr>td>button.btn.btn-default.btn-info,
daypicker>table>tbody>tr>td>button.btn.btn-sm.btn-info,
daypicker>table>tbody>tr>td>button.btn.btn-sm{
padding: 0.25rem;
font-size: 0.8rem;
}
Mayble I should put daypicker>table>tbody>tr>td
in a variable?
From other similar question on StackOverflow I understand I can use universal selectors but don't know how to use it in my case.
Updated the answer as per the comment
The snippet in your Q has button.btn
in common so you can just use that but as per your comment you don't need this style on button.btn.btn-sm.btn-danger
in this case you can work with this solutions :
#1
.daypicker>table>tbody>tr>td>button.btn:not(.btn-danger){
padding: 0.25rem;
font-size: 0.8rem;
}
This CSS would select all the button.btn
elements except the one(s) with a class of .btn-danger. Refer link
#2
.daypicker>table>tbody>tr>td>button.btn{
padding: 0.25rem;
font-size: 0.8rem;
}
/*the style below will reset to your need for .btn-danger*/;
.daypicker>table>tbody>tr>td>button.btn.btn-danger{
padding: /*your desired size*/;
font-size: /*your desired size*/;
}
It's up to you to use the one which is apt for your requirement. Hope this helps you.