func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView, cellForRowAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UITableViewCell {
let cell = tableView.dequeueReusableCell(withIdentifier: "CheckoutCell") as! CheckoutCell
let product = shoppingCart[indexPath.row]
var tfQuantity : UITextField!
cell.clickEditAction = { [weak self] celll in
guard let ss = self else { return }
let alert = UIAlertController(title: nil, message: "Enter new quantity", preferredStyle: .alert)
alert.addTextField { (textfield) in
tfQuantity = textfield
}
let okAction = UIAlertAction(title: "OK", style: .default) { (action) in
if tfQuantity.text == ""{
return
}
if let newQuantity = Int(tfQuantity.text){
product.quantity = newQuantity
self.tbvCheckout.reloadData()
}
return
}
alert.addAction(okAction)
self.present(alert, animated: true, completion: nil)
}
return cell
}
This line of code:
self.tbvCheckout.reloadData()
If I don't use [weak self] or [unowned self], does it create retain cycle between current object & UIAlertAction instance? What if I use this code instead: tableView.reloadData()?
Couple of things:
First, You have created a weak reference, but I don't see you using it in the code.
guard let ss = self else { return }
Any reference to self should be via this weak self variable "ss" that you have created.
Second, The alert action block should also have weak reference to self
let okAction = UIAlertAction(title: "OK", style: .default) { [weak self] (action) in
if tfQuantity.text == ""{
return
}
if let newQuantity = Int(tfQuantity.text){
product.quantity = newQuantity
self?.tbvCheckout.reloadData()
}
return
}