I hope to get help here one more time. Here is my sample input XML:
<Report>
<RecordValues>
<Record>
<FieldValue fieldName="firm_name" fieldValue="Firm_1"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="firm_number" fieldValue="11"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="prepared_by" fieldValue="PARKER"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="contact_number" fieldValue="123456789"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="trade_date" fieldValue="2010-10-17"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="symbol" fieldValue="ADM"/>
</Record>
<Record>
<FieldValue fieldName="firm_name" fieldValue="Firm_1"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="firm_number" fieldValue="11"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="prepared_by" fieldValue="PARKER"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="contact_number" fieldValue="123456789"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="trade_date" fieldValue="2010-10-16"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="symbol" fieldValue="ACW"/>
</Record>
<Record>
<FieldValue fieldName="firm_name" fieldValue="Firm_2"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="firm_number" fieldValue="12"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="prepared_by" fieldValue="EDWARDS"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="contact_number" fieldValue="123456780"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="trade_date" fieldValue="2010-10-19"/>
<FieldValue fieldName="symbol" fieldValue="ADS"/>
</Record>
</RecordValues>
</Report>
Here is the output I need to get:
A Firm_1 11
B PARKER 123456789
C 2010-10-17 ADM
C 2010-10-16 ACW
T 4
A Firm_2 12
B EDWARDS 123456780
C 2010-10-19 ADS
T 3
As you can see I need to group records by 'firm_name' or 'firm_number'. Each group must have one record of type 'A', one records of type 'B' and multiple records of type 'C'. Record 'T' is a total of each group without record 'T'. The input XML already sorted. I found Muenchian Method which is grouping records, but didn't succeed anything. Obviously I'm doing something wrong. Here is XSLT I wrote:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:strip-space elements="*"/>
<xsl:key name="value-by-firm" match="Report/RecordValues/Record/FieldValue" use="firm_number"/>
<xsl:template match="Record">
<xsl:for-each select="FieldValue/@fieldValue[count(. | key('value-by-firm', firm_number))]">
<xsl:text>A </xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="firm_name"/>
<xsl:text> </xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="firm_number"/>
<xsl:text>
</xsl:text>
<xsl:text>B </xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="prepared_by"/>
<xsl:text> </xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="contact_number"/>
<xsl:text>
</xsl:text>
<xsl:for-each select="key('value-by-firm', firm_number)">
<xsl:text>C </xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="trade_date"/>
<xsl:text> </xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="symbol"/>
<xsl:text>
</xsl:text>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Maybe there is another way to do that. Thanks in advance.
This stylesheet:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:key name="kRecordByFirmAndContact" match="Record"
use="concat(FieldValue[@fieldName='firm_number']
/@fieldValue,
'+',
FieldValue[@fieldName='contact_number']
/@fieldValue)"/>
<xsl:template
match="Record
[count(.|key('kRecordByFirmAndContact',
concat(FieldValue
[@fieldName='firm_number']
/@fieldValue,
'+',
FieldValue
[@fieldName='contact_number']
/@fieldValue))[1])
= 1 ]">
<xsl:variable name="vRecords"
select="key('kRecordByFirmAndContact',
concat(FieldValue
[@fieldName='firm_number']
/@fieldValue,
'+',
FieldValue
[@fieldName='contact_number']
/@fieldValue))"/>
<xsl:value-of select="concat('A ',
*[@fieldName='firm_name']
/@fieldValue,
' ',
*[@fieldName='firm_number']
/@fieldValue,
'
',
'B ',
*[@fieldName='prepared_by']
/@fieldValue,
' ',
*[@fieldName='contact_number']
/@fieldValue,
'
')"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="$vRecords" mode="RecordC"/>
<xsl:value-of select="concat('T ',count($vRecords) + 2,'
')"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="Record" mode="RecordC">
<xsl:value-of select="concat('C ',
*[@fieldName='trade_date']
/@fieldValue,
' ',
*[@fieldName='symbol']
/@fieldValue,
'
')"/>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Output:
A Firm_1 11
B PARKER 123456789
C 2010-10-17 ADM
C 2010-10-16 ACW
T 4
A Firm_2 12
B EDWARDS 123456780
C 2010-10-19 ADS
T 3
Note: As you can see this is not complex, but your schema makes code so verbose... That looks like M$ XML format for data dumps.