I have a situation where a function must return a value taken from a table. A cell in this table (let's assume the table just works...) may contain a value, or it might not. This value can also be one of several types: int, double, string, date
(but no other type).
What would such a function return? Is it a good idea to return std::optional<std::variant<std::string, int, double, std::chrono::time_point>>
?
Would that be a good use of optional
and variant
?
I would consider this to be a useful use of std::monostate
. Specifically, variant<std::monostate, int, double, std::string, std::chrono::time_point>
. monostate
is useful for cases where a variant
may not contain a value.
The nice thing about using an actual type rather than optional<variant>
is that visitation works normally on it. You can write a functor that can take a monostate
parameter, thus allowing you to use visit
for even "empty" variants.