So in addition to my prior topic (thank you guys for helping) routes with compact
I am now facing troubles with my store function, I am getting the error : "Trying to get property of non-object.
This is my store function in my Controller
public function store(Request $request)
{
// validate the data
$this->validate($request, array(
'title' => 'required|max:255',
'body' => 'required'
));
// store in the database
$userpost = new Usp;
$userpost->title = $request->title;
$userpost->body = $request->body;
$userpost->save();
Session::flash('success', 'The blog post was successfully saved!');
return redirect()->route('admin.userposts.show', $userpost->id);
}
This is the view to create userpost(to make it more clear, p.s. the same form with different route ofcourse, works for my simple posts but not for my user submitted posts)
@extends('index')
@section('index-stylesheets')
{!! Html::style('css/parsley.css') !!}
@endsection
@section('content')
<h1>Create New User Post</h1>
<hr>
{!! Form::open(array('route' => 'admin.userposts.store', 'data-parsley-validate' => '')) !!}
{{ Form::label('title', 'Title:') }}
{{ Form::text('title', null, array('class' => 'form-control', 'required' => '', 'maxlength' => '255')) }}
{{ Form::label('body', "Post Body:") }}
{{ Form::textarea('body', null, array('class' => 'form-control', 'required' => '')) }}
{{ Form::submit('Create Post', array('class' => 'btn btn-success btn-lg btn-block', 'style' => 'margin-top: 20px;')) }}
{!! Form::close() !!}
@endsection
@section('index-scripts')
{!! Html::script('js/parsley.min.js') !!}
@endsection
Method of showing the post:
public function show($id)
{
$userpost = Usp::find($id);
return view('admin.userposts.show', compact('userpost'));
}
So the fact is that the problem was not the store method but the routes.
Route::get('/userposts/{id}', 'UserPostsController@show')->name('admin.userposts.show');
Route::get('/userposts/create', 'UserPostsController@create')->name('admin.userposts.create');
Route::post('/userposts/store', 'UserPostsController@store')->name('admin.userposts.store');
When registering the routes in that order, when laravel will iterate over your routes, it will first encounter the show one, and it will therefore take "create" as the id. Therefore, it will go into the show method and it won't find any post that matches, the post being null, you get the error.
So, there are two ways of fixing this.
The first one (the easiest, works in all cases, maybe not the best) is to put the create route before the show route.
The second one, the best in my opinion, is to add a condition to the id (doesn't work in the case of a slug). As the ids are only integers, you get :
Route::get('/userposts/{id}', 'UserPostsController@show')->name('admin.userposts.show')->where('id', '[0-9]+');
Therefore, create won't match the regular expression and it won't go in the show method.
For "resource creations" (storing in database), I wouldn't use a "field-by-field" method.
Instead, I'd do something like this :
$userpost = Usp::create($request->only('title', 'body'));
I feel this is more talkative.
But, it won't work, laravel protects* us against such things. To make it work, you have two options.
(The best option in my opinion)
In your model, add a protected variable called $fillable with all your columns that you allow to mass assign*. In this case you would put :
protected $fillable = ['name'];
(The option if you are sure of what are you doing) In your model, you can say, hey, I know what I'm doing here, just let me do my stuff without guarding me. In this case you would put :
protected $guarded = [];
Notes :
$request->only('field1', ...)
gives you an array of the fields that you want with the fields name as keys, in this case it gives you ['field1' => $request->field1]
. In your case it will give you ['title' => $request->title, 'body' => $request->body]
.
Mass assignment is when you give an array to the model and it puts all attributes to the fields of the array. More informations here https://laravel.com/docs/5.4/eloquent#mass-assignment
When I mean laravel protects us against those things, it does't really protect us because it isn't a bad practice (instead, I find it more readable), but because it does allow you to make mistakes (for exemple, setting fields that don't exist).