I've done some stuff:
class Tuple1<T1, T2> {
private T1 a;
private T2 b;
public Tuple1(T1 a, T2 b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
public T1 getA() {
return a;
}
public T2 getB() {
return b;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "[" + a.toString() + ", " + b.toString() + "]";
}
}
Now I must to do Tuple2 (a, b + c field) and Tuple3 (a, b, c + d field), which will have the same functions as Tuple1, but without extends
and without code redundancy.
You might consider following solution:
class Tuple<T1, T2>
{
private T1 a;
private T2 b;
public Tuple1(T1 a, T2 b)
{
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
public T1 getA() { return a; }
public T2 getB() { return b; }
@Override
public String toString()
{
return "[" + a.toString() + ", " + b.toString() + "]";
}
}
class Tuple2<T1, T2, T3>
{
private Tuple1<T1, T2> tuple;
private T3 c;
public Tuple2(T1 a, T2 b, T3 c)
{
this.tuple = new Tuple1<T1, T2>(a, b);
this.c = c;
}
public T1 getA() { return tuple.getA(); }
public T2 getB() { return tuple.getB(); }
public T3 getC() { return c; }
@Override
public String toString()
{
return "[" + getA().toString() + ", " + getB().toString() + ", " + c.toString() + "]";
}
}
class Tuple3<T1, T2, T3, T4>
{
private Tuple2<T1, T2, T3> tuple;
private T4 d;
public Tuple3(T1 a, T2 b, T3 c, T4 d)
{
this.tuple = new Tuple2<T1, T2, T3>(a, b, c);
this.d = d;
}
public T1 getA() { return tuple.getA(); }
public T2 getB() { return tuple.getB(); }
public T3 getC() { return tuple.getC(); }
public T4 getD() { return d; }
@Override
public String toString()
{
return "[" + getA().toString() + ", " + getB().toString() + ", " + getC().toString() + ", " + d.toString() + "]";
}
}