Boost Fusion: validate adapted struct member ordering at compile time

Question

I'm using BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT(), and I need to check that all the members are declared and in the correct order. So first I did this:

template <typename Sequence>
struct checker
{
    static void check()
    {
        typedef typename mpl::accumulate<Sequence, mpl::size_t<0>,
            mpl::plus<mpl::_1, mpl::sizeof_<mpl::_2>>>::type total_size;
        static_assert(sizeof(Sequence) == total_size::value, "omitted field?");
    }
};

And this works:

struct foo
{
    int x;
    float y;
    double z;
};
BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT(foo, x, y, z);
checker<foo>::check(); // fails if any field is missing

Next I want to make sure the order is correct, so for example (x, z, y) in the above example should fail to compile. But so far I've only figured out a runtime solution (added to check()):

        const Sequence* dummy = nullptr;
        ++dummy;
        boost::fusion::for_each(*dummy, struct_offset_checker());

Using this functor:

struct struct_offset_checker
{
    mutable const void* _last = nullptr;

    template <typename Element>
    void operator()(const Element& element) const
    {
        if (&element <= _last)
            throw std::logic_error("struct member is declared in a different order");
        _last = &element;
    }
};

But I'd rather have a compile-time solution. Can you think of one?

The funny thing is that GCC is actually able to figure out at compile time when an exception will be thrown, if I have -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn - it tells me when a function which calls check() would not return (due to the logic_error).

If you want to try it yourself, the relevant headers are:

#include <stdexcept>
#include <boost/fusion/adapted.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/accumulate.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/plus.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/sizeof.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/size_t.hpp>

Answer 1

Using m.s.'s answer here as inspiration, I drew up a solution using Boost.MPL instead of std::make_index_sequence<>, partly because I'm more accustomed to this style:

typedef mpl::range_c<unsigned, 0, fusion::result_of::size<Sequence>::value - 1> IndicesWithoutLast;
mpl::for_each<IndicesWithoutLast>(struct_offset_checker<Sequence>());

Using this functor:

template <typename Sequence>
struct struct_offset_checker
{
    template <typename Index>
    constexpr void operator()(Index)
    {
        typedef typename mpl::plus<Index, mpl::int_<1>>::type NextIndex;

        constexpr Sequence* dummy = nullptr;
        constexpr void* curr = &fusion::at<Index>(*dummy);
        constexpr void* next = &fusion::at<NextIndex>(*dummy);
        static_assert(curr < next, "fields are out of order");
    }
};