In unqlite c library I found following code:
pObj = jx9VmReserveMemObj(&(*pVm),&nIdx);
where pVm
is:
typedef struct jx9_vm jx9_vm;
jx9_vm *pVm
and function called is declared as:
jx9_value * jx9VmReserveMemObj(jx9_vm *, sxu32 *);
What for construct &(*pVm)
is used in call instead of just pVm
? Is &(*pVm)
equivalent to pVm
?
Quoting C11
, chapter §6.5.3.2, Address and indirection operators
[...] If the operand is the result of a unary
*
operator, neither that operator nor the&
operator is evaluated and the result is as if both were omitted, except that the constraints on the operators still apply and the result is not an lvalue. [...]
So, yes, they are equivalent.
This construct can be used, however, to check the type of the argument against a pointer type. From the property of unary *
operator,
The operand of the unary
*
operator shall have pointer type.
So, the construct &(*pVm)
pvm
is a pointer or array name.pvm
is a non-pointer type variable.See the other answer by Alter Mann for code-wise example.
One more difference (in general) is, pVm
can be assigned (can be used as LHS of the assignment operator), but &(*pVm)
cannot.