I use simple circular buffer like this
var
Values: array [byte] of single;
ptr: byte;
In this test example
for ptr:=0 to 10 do Values[Byte(ptr-5)]:=1;
I expect to have set to 1 first 5 values and last 5 values, but XE4 compiller produce incorrect code, its using 32bit pointer math to calculate array index:
for ptr:=0 to 10 do Values[Byte(ptr-5)]:=1;
005B94BB C645FB00 mov byte ptr [ebp-$05],$00
005B94BF 33C0 xor eax,eax
005B94C1 8A45FB mov al,[ebp-$05]
005B94C4 C78485E0FBFFFF0000803F mov [ebp+eax*4-$0420],$3f800000
005B94CF FE45FB inc byte ptr [ebp-$05]
005B94D2 807DFB0B cmp byte ptr [ebp-$05],$0b
005B94D6 75E7 jnz $005b94bf
Is it my wrong code and whats proper way to operate byte indexes?
The question is:
Is a wrap expected within the
Byte()
cast?
Lets compare the disassembly with overflow checking on/off.
{$Q+}
Project71.dpr.21: for ptr:= 0 to 10 do Values[Byte(ptr-5)]:= 1;
0041D568 33DB xor ebx,ebx
0041D56A 0FB6C3 movzx eax,bl
0041D56D 83E805 sub eax,$05
0041D570 7105 jno $0041d577
0041D572 E82D8DFEFF call @IntOver
0041D577 0FB6C0 movzx eax,al
0041D57A C704870000803F mov [edi+eax*4],$3f800000
0041D581 43 inc ebx
0041D582 80FB0B cmp bl,$0b
0041D585 75E3 jnz $0041d56a
{$Q-}
Project71.dpr.21: for ptr:= 0 to 10 do Values[Byte(ptr-5)]:= 1;
0041D566 B30B mov bl,$0b
0041D568 B808584200 mov eax,$00425808
0041D56D C7000000803F mov [eax],$3f800000
0041D573 83C004 add eax,$04
0041D576 FECB dec bl
0041D578 75F3 jnz $0041d56d
With {$Q+}
the wraps works, while with {$Q-}
the wrap does not work and the compiler does not generate a range error for the wrong array indexing when {$R+}
is set.
So, to me the conclusion is: Since the range check on
does not generate a run-time error for an array index out of bounds, a wrap is expected.
This is further proved by the fact that a wrap is done when overflow checking is on.
This should be reported as a bug in the compiler.
Done: https://quality.embarcadero.com/browse/RSP-15527 "Type cast fail within array indexing"
Note: a workaround is given by @Rudy in his answer.
Addendum:
Following code:
for ptr:= 0 to 10 do WriteLn(Byte(ptr-5));
generates:
251
252
253
254
255
0
1
2
3
4
5
for all combinations of range/overflow checking.
Likewise Values[Byte(-1)] := 1;
assigns 1 to Values[255] for all compiler options.
The documentation for Value Typecasts says:
The resulting value is obtained by converting the expression in parentheses. This may involve truncation or extension if the size of the specified type differs from that of the expression. The expression's sign is always preserved.