Why are annotation string values not interned?

Question

The following snippet prints 4 distinct hash codes, despite reusing a string constant and literal. Why are string values not interned on annotation elements?

public class Foo {
    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
    @interface Bar {
        String CONSTANT = "foo";

        String value() default CONSTANT;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        System.out.println(System.identityHashCode(Bar.CONSTANT));
        System.out.println(System.identityHashCode(Foo.class.getMethod("test1").getAnnotation(Bar.class).value()));
        System.out.println(System.identityHashCode(Foo.class.getMethod("test2").getAnnotation(Bar.class).value()));
        System.out.println(System.identityHashCode(Foo.class.getMethod("test3").getAnnotation(Bar.class).value()));
    }

    @Bar
    public void test1() {}

    @Bar("foo")
    public void test2() {}

    @Bar(Bar.CONSTANT)
    public void test3() {}
}

Answer 1

String literal are interned but annotations are subject to parse and they are stored in byte arrays. If you look at the class java.lang.reflect.Method you can see this:

private byte[]              annotations;
private byte[]              parameterAnnotations;
private byte[]              annotationDefault;  

Take also a look at the method public Object getDefaultValue() of the same class to see how the AnnotationParser is called. The flow continues till here AnnotationParser.parseConst and enter in

case 's':
  return constPool.getUTF8At(constIndex);

The method ConstantPool.getUTF8At is a delegate to a native method. You can see the code here native implementation getUFT8At. The parsed constant is never interned and is never retrieved from the StringTable (where string are interned).

I think it could be a choice of implementation. Interning has been created to make more fast comparison between String literal and so is used only for interning literal usable in method implementation.