I have to do a simple calculator in assembly using EMU8086, but every time I try to launch it EMU8086 gives this error:
INT 21h, AH=09h - address: 170B5 byte 24h not found after 2000 bytes. ; correct example of INT 21h/9h: mov dx, offset msg mov ah, 9 int 21h ret msg db "Hello$"
I checked the other stuff, but there were no mistakes:
data segment
choice db ?
snum1 db 4 dup(?)
snum2 db 4 dup(?)
sres db 4 dup(?)
num1 db ?
num2 db ?
res db ?
;;menu1 db "Chose a function to procced", 10, 13, "Add [+]", 10, 13, "Sub [-]", 10, 13
;;menu2 db "Mul [*]", 10, 13, "Div [/]", 10, 13, "Mod [%]", 10, 13, "Pow [^]", 10, 13, "Exit [x]$"
messStr db "Enter Your Choice:",10,13,"",10,13,"Add --> +",10,13,"Sub --> -",10,13,"Mul --> *",10,13,"Div --> /",10,13,"Mod --> %",10,13,"Pow --> ^",10,13,"Exit --> X",10,13,"$"
msg1 db "Enter first number$"
msg2 db "Enter second number$"
msg3 db "Press any key to procced$"
msg4 db "The result is $"
ends
stack segment
dw 128 dup(0)
ends
code segment
assume cs:code, ds:data, ss:stack
newline proc ;; new line
push ax
push dx
mov ah, 2
mov DL, 10
int 21h
mov ah, 2
mov DL, 13
int 21h
pop dx
pop ax
ret
endp
printstr proc ;; print string
push BP
mov BP, SP
push dx
push ax
mov dx, [BP+4]
mov ah, 9
int 21h
pop ax
pop dx
pop BP
ret 2
endp
inputstr proc ;; collect input
push BP
mov BP, SP
push bx
push ax
mov bx, [BP+4]
k1:
mov ah, 1
int 21h
cmp al, 13
je sofk
mov [bx], al
inc bx
jmp k1
sofk:
mov byte ptr [bx], '$'
pop ax
pop bx
pop BP
ret 2
endp
getNums proc ;; get the numbers
call newline
push offset msg1
call printstr
call newline
push offset snum1
call inputstr
call newline
push offset msg2
call printstr
call newline
push offset snum2
call inputstr
ret
endp
start:
mov ax, data
mov ds, ax
mov ax, stack
mov ss, ax
;; print the main menu
call newline
push offset msg4
call printstr
;; collect the input
call newline
mov bx, offset choice
mov ah, 1
int 21h
mov [bx], al
;; check it
mov al, choice
cmp al, '+'
jne cexit
call getNums
jmp cont
cexit:
cmp al, 'x'
je cend
cont:
;; pause before going to the main menu
call newline
push offset msg3
call printstr
mov bx, offset choice
mov ah, 1
int 21h
call newline
call newline
call newline
jmp start
cend:
mov ax, 4c00h
int 21h
ends
end start
I cut most of the code segment because it wasn't important here.
After experimenting with the code I found that the problem was related to the lengths of the messages in the data segment. menu1
& menu2
were too long and any message after them can't be printed (msg1
& msg2
are printed, but nothing after them). I checked if I should merge menu1
& menu2
, but it didn't help out. Please help me find out what is wrong with it.
The error message means you use int 21h
/ AH=09h
on a string that didn't end with a $
(ASCII 24h). The system-call handler checked 2000 bytes without finding one.
Often, that means your code or data is buggy, e.g. in a fixed string you forgot a $
at the end, or if copying bytes into a buffer then you maybe overwrote or never stored a '$'
in the first place.
But in this case, it appears that EMU8086 has a bug assembling push offset msg4
. (In a way that truncates the 00B5h
16-bit address to 8-bit, and sign-extends back to 16, creating a wrong pointer that points past where any $
characters are in your data.)
Based on the error message below I know you are using EMU8086 as your development environment.
INT 21h, AH=09h - address: 170B5 byte 24h not found after 2000 bytes. ; correct example of INT 21h/9h: mov dx, offset msg mov ah, 9 int 21h ret msg db "Hello$"
I'm no expert on EMU8086 by any stretch of the imagination. I do know why your offsets don't work. I can't tell you if there is a proper way to resolve this, or if it's an EMU8086 bug. Someone with a better background on this emulator would know.
You have created a data
segment with some variables. It seems okay to me (but I may be missing something). I decided to load up EMU8086 to actually try this code. It assembled without error. Using the debugger I single stepped to the push offset msg1
line near the beginning of the program. I knew right away from the instruction encoding what was going on. This is the decoded instruction I saw:
It shows the instruction was encoded as push 0b5h
where 0b5h is the offset. The trouble is that it is encoded as a push imm8
. The two highlighted bytes on the left hand pane show it was encoded with these bytes:
6A B5
If you review an instruction set reference you'll find the encodings for PUSH instruction encoded with 6A
is listed as:
Opcode* Instruction Op/En 64-Bit Mode Compat/Leg Mode Description 6A ib PUSH imm8 I Valid Valid Push imm8.
You may say that B5
fits within a byte (imm8) so what is the problem? The smallest value that can be pushed onto the stack with push
in 16-bit mode is a 16-bit word. Since a byte is smaller than a word, the processor takes the byte and sign extends it to make a 16-bit value. The instruction set reference actually says this:
If the source operand is an immediate of size less than the operand size, a sign-extended value is pushed on the stack
B5
is binary 10110101 . The sign bit is the left most bit. Since it is 1 the upper 8 bits placed onto the stack will be 11111111b (FF). If the sign bit is 0 then then 00000000b is placed in the upper 8 bits. The emulator didn't place 00B5
onto the stack, it placed FFB5
. That is incorrect! This can be confirmed if I step through the push 0b5h
instruction and review the stack. This is what I saw:
Observe that the value placed on the stack is FFB5
. I could not find an appropriate syntax (even using the word
modifier) to force EMU8086 to encode this as push imm16
. A push imm16
would be able to encode the entire word as push 00b5
which would work.
Two things you can do. You can place 256 bytes of dummy data in your data
segment like this:
data segment
db 256 dup(?)
choice db ?
... rest of data
Why does this work? Every variable defined after the dummy data will be an offset that can't be represented in a single byte. Because of this EMU8086 is forced to encode push offset msg1
as a word push.
The cleaner solution is to use the LEA instruction. This is the load effective address
instruction. It takes a memory operand and computes the address (in this case the offset relative to the data segment). You can replace all your code that uses offset
with something like:
lea ax, [msg1]
push ax
AX can be any of the general purpose 16-bit registers. Once in a register, push the 16-bit register onto the stack.
Someone may have a better solution for this, or know a way to resolve this. If so please feel free to comment.
Given the information above, you may ask why did it seem to work when you moved the data around? The reason is that the way you reorganized all the strings (placing the long one last) caused all the variables to start with offsets that were less than < 128. Because of this the PUSH of an 8-bit immediate offset sign extended a 0 in the top bits when placed on the stack. The offsets would be correct. Once the offsets are >= 128 (and < 256) the sign bit is 1 and the value placed on the stack sign will have an upper 8 bits of 1 rather than 0.
There are other bugs in your program, I'm concentrating on the issue directly related to the error you are receiving.