I'm using Jodd DbOom to manage my queries and it's really awesome. But right now I'm are facing an undocumented situation.
I have a query that returns a list of objects(A), and each A has a list of objects (B), and each B is joined with other objects(C, D, E, etc). The problem is that the class JoinHintResolver
doesn't set the values C, D, E on the B objects. The B objects are set correctly on the A objects.
Below is a test method to reproduce the error. The other used classes(Girl
, BadBoy
) are from Jodd test packages.
public void testHintsList() {
Room room = new Room();
Girl girl = new Girl();
BadBoy badBoy = new BadBoy();
Object[] data = new Object[] { room, badBoy, girl };
JoinHintResolver jhr = new JoinHintResolver();
Object[] result = jhr.join(data, "room, room.boys, room.boys.girl");
assertEquals(1, result.length);
assertTrue(result[0] instanceof Room);
room = (Room) result[0];
badBoy = room.getBoys().get(0);
assertEquals(girl, badBoy.girl);
}
public class Room {
private Long id;
private List<BadBoy> boys;
public Room() {
}
public Long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public List<BadBoy> getBoys() {
return boys;
}
public void setBoys(List<BadBoy> boys) {
this.boys = boys;
}
}
The documentation doesn't have any example like this, and Google neither. So I don't know if I did something wrong, or if Jodd wasn't prepared for this situation.
How could I set the hints so that Jodd would set the values correctly?
So the problem here is the fact that you have a collection of BadBoy
s in your Room
. And the hint:
room.boys.girl
suggest they you want to inject a Girl
instance into a collection. In java words, this is equivalent to:
getRoom().getBoys().setGirl(girl);
Obviously, since getBoys()
returns a List
, we can not set the girl
property.
To test this what I've said, use the following hint instead:
room.boys[0].girl
This would inject the girl
instance into the very first element of the list. Or, you can change your Room
to have just a Boy
property, instead of the list, and the original hint will work.
I hope this works for you :)
(see test)
In this branch I have something that looks like a fix :) Now you can write something like:
select $C{room.*}, $C{room.boys:boy.*}, $C{room.boys.girl:girl.*}
from $T{Room room} join $T{Boy4 boy} on $room.id=$boy.roomId
join $T{Girl4 girl} on $boy.id=$girl.boyId
order by $room.id, $boy.id
And you can have the following model:
Room
has list of Boy
. Each Boy
has one Girl
assigned. When entityAware
is on, this should work. Maybe you have time to test the branch?