I have a list of types defined as:
typedef boost::mpl::list<Apple, Pear, Brick> OriginalList;
I would like to create a second list that does not contain any fruit, i.e. the resultant list formed from the first list would contain a single type Brick. Fruit is identified through a static const variable defined within the types, e.g.:
struct Apple
{
static const bool IsFruit = true;
};
I currently have a solution that involves creating a meta-function class, and using boost::mpl::remove_if
. I believe I should be able to make this more elegant by using boost::mpl::lambda to remove the need for the separate RemoveFruit
struct. Any suggestions on how to do this?
Full code as it currently stands:
include <boost/static_assert.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/list.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/remove_if.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/size.hpp>
#include <iostream>
struct Apple
{
static const bool IsFruit = true;
};
struct Pear
{
static const bool IsFruit = true;
};
struct Brick
{
static const bool IsFruit = false;
};
typedef boost::mpl::list<Apple, Pear, Brick> OriginalList;
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(boost::mpl::size<OriginalList>::type::value == 3);
// This is what I would like to get rid of:
struct RemoveFruit
{
template <typename T>
struct apply
{
typedef boost::mpl::bool_<T::IsFruit> type;
};
};
// Assuming I can embed some predicate directly in here?
typedef boost::mpl::remove_if<
OriginalList,
RemoveFruit
>::type NoFruitList;
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(boost::mpl::size<NoFruitList>::type::value == 1);
int main()
{
std::cout << "There are " << boost::mpl::size<OriginalList>::type::value << " items in the original list\n";
std::cout << "There are " << boost::mpl::size<NoFruitList>::type::value << " items in the no fruit list\n";
return 0;
}
I think the best you can do is to define an IsFruit struct like
template <typename T> struct isFruit : boost::mpl::bool_<T::IsFruit> {};
And then you can define your no-fruit list as
typedef boost::mpl::remove_if<
OriginalList,
boost::mpl::lambda< isFruit< boost::mpl::_1 > >::type
>::type NoFruitList;
The additional struct is needed to get access to the IsFruit field in your classes.
Note that if you want to get rid of the additional struct entirely, you'll have to rename the boolean members of your other classes. If you follow the boost::mpl convention and call them value
instead of IsFruit
, you can define NoFruitList as
typedef boost::mpl::remove_if<
OriginalList,
boost::mpl::lambda<boost::mpl::_1>::type
>::type NoFruitList;