I don't understand the last line of the example on page 148 of the FCD (§7.6.1.2/4):
const int&& foo();
int i;
struct A { double x; };
const A* a = new A();
decltype(foo()) x1 = i; // type is const int&&
decltype(i) x2; // type is int
decltype(a->x) x3; // type is double
decltype((a->x)) x4 = x3; // type is const double&
Why do the parentheses make a difference here? Shouldn't it simply be double
like in the line above?
Just above that example, it says
- if e is an unparenthesized id-expression or a class member access (5.2.5), decltype(e) is the type of the entity named by e.
- if e is an lvalue, decltype(e) is T&, where T is the type of e;
I think decltype(a->x)
is an example of the "class member access" and decltype((a->x))
is an example of lvalue.