Is it a good idea? For a reason I thought it should be faster than boost's tokenizer or split. however most of the time I'm stuck in the boost::spirit::compile
template <typename Iterator>
struct ValueList : bsq::grammar<Iterator, std::vector<std::string>()>
{
ValueList(const std::string& sep, bool isCaseSensitive) : ValueList::base_type(query)
{
if(isCaseSensitive)
{
query = value >> *(sep >> value);
value = *(bsq::char_ - sep);
}
else
{
auto separator = bsq::no_case[sep];
query = value >> *(separator >> value);
value = *(bsq::char_ - separator);
}
}
bsq::rule<Iterator, std::vector<std::string>()> query;
bsq::rule<Iterator, std::string()> value;
};
inline bool Split(std::vector<std::string>& result, const std::string& buffer, const std::string& separator,
bool isCaseSensitive)
{
result.clear();
ValueList<std::string::const_iterator> parser(separator, isCaseSensitive);
auto itBeg = buffer.begin();
auto itEnd = buffer.end();
if(!(bsq::parse(itBeg, itEnd, parser, result) && (itBeg == itEnd)))
result.push_back(buffer);
return true;
}
I've implemented it as shown above. What is wrong with my code? or just because the separator is defined in runtime the recompilation is inevitable?
EDIT001:
Example and comparison with possible implementation with boost::split and original imp with tokenizer on CoLiRu
Looks like coliru is down now. In any case these are result for 1M runs on string "2lkhj309|ioperwkl|20sdf39i|rjjdsf|klsdjf230o|kx23904iep2|xp39f4p2|xlmq2i3219" with separator "|"
8000000 splits in 1081ms.
8000000 splits in 1169ms.
8000000 splits in 2663ms.
first is for tokenizer, second is for boost::split and the third is for boost::spirit
First off, the different versions do not do the same thing:
boost::split
but it doesn't appear to be a feature for boost::tokenizer
)Yes, recompiles are inevitable with dynamic separators. But no, this is not the bottleneck (the other approaches have dynamic separators too):
I've done some optimizations. The timings:
8000000 original (boost::tokenizer) rate: 2.84257μs
10000000 possible (boost::split) rate: 3.09941μs
10000000 spirit (dynamic version) rate: 1.45456μs
10000000 spirit (direct version, avoid type erasure) rate: 1.25588μs
next step:
10000000 spirit (precompiled sep) rate: 1.18059μs
8000000 original (boost::tokenizer) rate: 2.92805μs
10000000 possible (boost::split) rate: 2.75442μs
10000000 spirit (dynamic version) rate: 1.32821μs
10000000 spirit (direct version, avoid type erasure) rate: 1.10712μs
next step:
10000000 spirit (precompiled sep) rate: 1.0791μs
Local system g++:
sehe@desktop:/tmp$ time ./test
8000000 original (boost::tokenizer) rate: 1.80061μs
10000000 possible (boost::split) rate: 1.29754μs
10000000 spirit (dynamic version) rate: 0.607789μs
10000000 spirit (direct version, avoid type erasure) rate: 0.488087μs
next step:
10000000 spirit (precompiled sep) rate: 0.498769μs
As you can see the Spirit approach doesn't need to be slower. What steps did I take? http://paste.ubuntu.com/11001344/
no_case[char_(delimiter)]
if required) 2.742μs.value
subrule (reduced copying and dynamic dispatch because of type-erased non-terminal rule) 2.579μs.Made delimiter charset instead of string literal: 2.693μs.
see intermediate version on coliru. (I recommend the code below, it's much more cleaned up)
Using qi::raw[] instead of std::string synthesized attributes (avoid copying!) 0.624072μs
spirit_direct
implementation) rate: 0.491011μsNow it seems fairly obvious that all the implementations would benefit from not "compiling" the separator each time. I didn't do it for all the approaches, but for fun let's do it for the Spirit version:
#include <boost/algorithm/string.hpp>
#include <boost/tokenizer.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
#include <chrono>
#include <iostream>
void original(std::vector<std::string>& result, const std::string& input, const std::string& delimiter)
{
result.clear();
boost::char_separator<char> sep(delimiter.c_str());
boost::tokenizer<boost::char_separator<char>, std::string::const_iterator, std::string> tok(input, sep);
for (const auto& token : tok)
{
result.push_back(token);
}
}
void possible(std::vector<std::string>& result, const std::string& input, const std::string& delimiter)
{
result.clear();
boost::split(result, input, boost::is_any_of(delimiter), boost::algorithm::token_compress_off);
}
namespace bsq = boost::spirit::qi;
void spirit_direct(std::vector<std::string>& result, const std::string& input, char const* delimiter)
{
result.clear();
using namespace bsq;
if (!parse(input.begin(), input.end(), raw[*(char_ - char_(delimiter))] % char_(delimiter), result))
result.push_back(input);
}
namespace detail {
template <typename Sep> bsq::rule<std::string::const_iterator, std::vector<std::string>()>
make_spirit_parser(Sep const& sep)
{
using namespace bsq;
return raw[*(char_ - sep)] % sep;
}
static const auto precompiled_pipes = make_spirit_parser('|');
}
void spirit(std::vector<std::string>& result, const std::string& input, char const* delimiter)
{
result.clear();
if (!bsq::parse(input.begin(), input.end(), detail::make_spirit_parser(bsq::char_(delimiter)), result))
result.push_back(input);
}
void spirit_pipes(std::vector<std::string>& result, const std::string& input)
{
result.clear();
if (!bsq::parse(input.begin(), input.end(), detail::precompiled_pipes, result))
result.push_back(input);
}
template <typename F> void bench(std::string const& caption, F approach) {
size_t const iterations = 1000000;
using namespace std::chrono;
using C = high_resolution_clock;
auto start = C::now();
size_t count = 0;
for (auto i = 0U; i < iterations; ++i) {
count += approach();
}
auto us = duration_cast<std::chrono::microseconds>(C::now() - start).count();
std::cout << count << " " << caption << " rate: " << (1.*us/iterations) << "μs\n";
}
int main()
{
std::string const input = "2309|ioperwkl|2039i|rjjdsf|klsdjf230o|kx23904iep2|xp,39,4p2|xlmq2i3219||";
auto separator = "|";
std::vector<std::string> result;
bench("original (boost::tokenizer)", [&] {
original(result, input, separator);
return result.size();
});
bench("possible (boost::split)", [&] {
possible(result, input, separator);
return result.size();
});
bench("spirit (dynamic version)", [&] {
spirit(result, input, separator);
return result.size();
});
bench("spirit (direct version, avoid type erasure)", [&] {
spirit_direct(result, input, separator);
return result.size();
});
std::cout << "\nnext step:\n";
bench("spirit (precompiled sep)", [&] {
spirit_pipes(result, input);
return result.size();
});
}