I'm looking to extend the functionality described here but for member functions, what would be the syntax in this case?
Also, the (*) in the template definition, is that de-referencing the function pointer so the compiler can deduce the template arguments?
Would appreciate any input!
Thanks
template <class F> struct ArgType;
template <class R, class T>
struct ArgType<R(*)(T)> {
typedef T type;
};
void f(int) {}
#include <type_traits>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
// To prove
std::cout << std::is_same< ArgType<decltype(&f)>::type, int >::value << '\n';
// To use
ArgType<decltype(&f)>::type a;
}
Pointer-to-members look like Ret (Cls::*)(Args...) [cv-qualifiers] [ref-qualifiers]
. So you can extend your class to deduce the first type thusly:
template <class F> struct ArgType;
template <typename Ret, typename Cls, typename T, typename... Args>
struct ArgType<Ret (Cls::*)(T, Args...)> {
using type = T;
};
Note that you can make this more generic by write a metafunction that gives you the n
th argument:
template <typename Ret, typename Cls, typename... Args>
struct ArgType<Ret (Cls::*)(Args...)> {
template <size_t N>
struct get_arg {
using type = typename std::tuple_element<N,
std::tuple<Args...>>::type;
};
};
So ArgType<F>::arg<0>::type
would be the type you seek.