I am trying to replace some thrust calls to arrayfire to check the performance.
I am not sure if I am using properly arrayfire because the results I am taking do not match at all.
So , the thrust code for example I am using is:
cudaMalloc( (void**) &devRow, N * sizeof(float) );
...//devRow is filled
thrust::device_ptr<float> SlBegin( devRow );
for ( int i = 0; i < N; i++, SlBegin += PerSlElmts )
{
thrust::inclusive_scan( SlBegin, SlBegin + PerSlElmts, SlBegin );
}
cudaMemcpy( theRow, devRow, N * sizeof(float), cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost );
//use theRow...
Arrayfire:
af::array SlBegin( N , devRow );
for ( int i = 0;i < N; i++,SlBegin += PerSlElmts )
{
accum( SlBegin );
}
cudaMemcpy( theRow, devRow, N * sizeof(float), cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost );
//use theRow..
I am not sure how arrayfire handles the copy : af::array SlBegin( N , devRow );
.In thrust we have the device pointer which points from devRow to SlBegin , but in arrayfire..?
Also , I wanted to ask about using gfor . In arrayfire webpage , it states that
Do not use this function directly; see GFOR: Parallel For-Loops.
And then for GFOR :
GFOR is disabled in the current version of ArrayFire
So , we can't use gfor?
---------UPDATE---------------------------
I have a small running example which shows the different results:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <cuda.h>
#include <cuda_runtime.h>
#include <curand_kernel.h>
#include "arrayfire.h"
#include <thrust/scan.h>
#include <thrust/host_vector.h>
#include <thrust/device_vector.h>
__global__ void Kernel( const int N ,float * const devRow )
{
int i = threadIdx.x;
if ( i < N )
devRow[ i ] = i;
}
int main(){
int N = 6;
int Slices = 2;
int PerSlElmts = 3;
float * theRow = (float*) malloc ( N * sizeof( float ));
for ( int i = 0; i < N; i ++ )
theRow[ i ] = 0;
// raw pointer to device memory
float * devRow;
cudaMalloc( (void **) &devRow, N * sizeof( float ) );
Kernel<<< 1,N >>>( N , devRow );
cudaDeviceSynchronize();
// wrap raw pointer with a device_ptr
thrust::device_ptr<float> SlBegin( devRow );
for ( int i = 0; i < Slices; i++ , SlBegin += PerSlElmts )
thrust::inclusive_scan( SlBegin, SlBegin + PerSlElmts , SlBegin );
cudaMemcpy( theRow, devRow, N * sizeof(float), cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost );
for ( int i = 0; i < N; i++ )
printf("\n Thrust accum : %f",theRow[ i ] );
//--------------------------------------------------------------------//
Kernel<<< 1,N >>>( N , devRow );
cudaDeviceSynchronize();
af::array SlBeginFire( N, devRow );
for ( int i = 0; i < Slices; i++ , SlBeginFire += PerSlElmts )
af::accum( SlBeginFire );
SlBeginFire.host( theRow );
for ( int i = 0; i < N; i++ )
printf("\n Arrayfire accum : %f",theRow[ i ] );
cudaFree( devRow );
free( theRow );
return 0;
}
It looks like you are trying to run a column-wise (0th-dim in ArrayFire) scan on a 2D array. Here is some code that you could use:
af::array SlBegin(N, devRow);
af::array result = accum(SlBegin, 0);
Here is a sample output
A [5 3 1 1]
0.7402 0.4464 0.7762
0.9210 0.6673 0.2948
0.0390 0.1099 0.7140
0.9690 0.4702 0.3585
0.9251 0.5132 0.6814
accum(A, 0) [5 3 1 1]
0.7402 0.4464 0.7762
1.6612 1.1137 1.0709
1.7002 1.2236 1.7850
2.6692 1.6938 2.1435
3.5943 2.2070 2.8249
This runs and inclusive scan on each column independently.
As for gfor, it has been added to the Open Source version of ArrayFire. As this code base is still a beta, improvements and fixes are taking place very rapidly. So keep a watch on our github page.