Search code examples
c++c++11sizeofstdarray

What is the sizeof std::array<char, N>?


What does the C++ standard say about what sizeof(std::array<char, N>) should be (for some constant N)?

In a comment to a different question, it was mentioned that std::array is not always "stack allocated". The comment was in response to a different comment that speculated that putting a too large of a constant for std::array that is declared as a local variable could cause the program to abort due to insufficient resources for the "stack allocated" variable. I assume the followup comment meant that it would be possible for std::array to somehow switch to a dynamic allocation mode.

I could imagine that there could be some kind of SFINAE could be applied for an array size threshold that triggers a specialization of std::array that actually dynamically allocates an array and manages it. In that case, the sizeof(std::array<...>) might just be the size of a pointer. Is that allowed to happen?


Solution

  • Obviously sizeof(std::array<char, N>) != N if N == 0. It also doesn't necessarily hold for N > 0. §23.3.2.1 [array.overview]/p1-2:

    The header <array> defines a class template for storing fixed-size sequences of objects. An array supports random access iterators. An instance of array<T, N> stores N elements of type T, so that size() == N is an invariant. The elements of an array are stored contiguously, meaning that if a is an array<T, N> then it obeys the identity &a[n] == &a[0] + n for all 0 <= n < N.

    An array is an aggregate (8.5.1) that can be initialized with the syntax

    array<T, N> a = { initializer-list };
    

    where initializer-list is a comma-separated list of up to N elements whose types are convertible to T.

    §8.5.1 [dcl.init.aggr]/p1:

    An aggregate is an array or a class (Clause 9) with no user-provided constructors (12.1), no private or protected non-static data members (Clause 11), no base classes (Clause 10), and no virtual functions (10.3).

    Since array is an aggregate type, it can't have a custom constructor that performs dynamic allocation, and it must store the elements directly since it must be able to be initialized from a initializer list using aggregate initialization. However, nothing in the standard prevents the implementation from adding extra stuff after its C-style array member, as long as array<T, N> a = { initializer-list }; has the defined semantics when the initializer-list contains at most N members. An implementation that looks like

    template<typename T, size_t N>
    struct array {
        //typedefs and member functions omitted
    
        T _Elems[N];
        double _Because_I_can;
    };
    // specialization for N == 0 case omitted
    

    is perfectly legal. Therefore, there's no guarantee that sizeof(std::array<char, N>) == N.