I am creating a function with a generic type and that generic type is an abstract type which I need to instantiate. This code will explain it more clearly:
public <T extends AbstractRow> foo(){//no I did not actually name the function foo
ArrayList<T> arr=new ArrayList<T>();
arr.add(new T(...)); //cant instantiate objects of abstract class
}
Basically I want to enforce "T extends AbstractRow but is not Abstract itself".
I realize you can't instantiate abstract classes, so I'd like a suggestion on a workaround or some other method that would allow me to mimic the behavior of creating an object of a generic type.
Your main issue isn't that you're working with an abstract class - in which case the suggestions posted in the comments would be useful. The bigger problem is that you're trying to instantiate a generic type directly (read: new T()
) - which, simply put, you can't do in Java because of type erasure.
That said, there's always a workaround:
/**@param clazz the subclass you want to instantiate */
public <T extends AbstractRow> foo(Class<T> clazz) {
ArrayList<T> arr = new ArrayList<T>();
arr.add(clazz.newInstance); //instantiate new instance of given subclass
}
Usage:
abstract class Test1 {}
class Test2 extends Test1{ }
class Test<T> {
public static <T extends Test1> T foo(Class<T> clazz) {
T toReturn = null;
try{ toReturn = clazz.newInstance(); } catch (Exception e) { };
return toReturn ;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Test1 t1 = t.foo(test2.class);
System.out.println(t1.getClass()); //prints "class pkgname.test2"
}
}