perl using bless self in script and PerlCritic

Question

I am used to using $self for OO Perl even when I am just writing self-contained scripts without naming my package at all. For example, my script.pl would start like this:

use strict;
use warnings;
my $self = bless {};
$self->time_stamp(localtime(time()));
1;

sub time_stamp {
  my ($self,@args) = @_;
  # Getter/setter
  my $ftime_stamp;
  if( 1 < scalar @args ) {
    $ftime_stamp = strftime "%Y%m%d_%H%M%S", @args;
    $self->{'time_stamp'} = $ftime_stamp;
  }
  return $self->{'time_stamp'};
}
[...]

These scripts sometimes turn into proper modules, but some times I just let them be as such.

This though goes against Perl Critic of "One-argument blesses":

One-argument "bless" used at line 162, column 12.  See page 365 of PBP.  Severity: 5

Is there a clean way of naming my bless but still having everything contained in my script.pl?

Answer 1

Not everything criticized by perlcritic has to be fixed. But usually, it really is preferable to specify the package name for bless.

If you don't declare a package name, your code implicitly is in package main. If you don't care about the actual name and want to refer to the current package, use the __PACKAGE__ symbol, e.g.:

my $self = bless {} => __PACKAGE__;

You could also write a little bit of boilerplate:

sub new {
  my ($class) = @_;
  return bless {} => $class;
}

my $self = __PACKAGE__->new;

Or you could use an object system like Moo:

use Moo;
has _time_stamp => (is => 'rw');

sub time_stamp {
  my ($self, @args) = @_;
  if( 1 < scalar @args ) {
    $self->_time_stamp(strftime "%Y%m%d_%H%M%S", @args);
  }
  return $self->_time_stamp;
}

my $self = __PACKAGE__->new;  # a "new" is autogenerated