This answer instructs how to convert java.util.concurrent.Future
into scala.concurrent.Future
, while managing where the blocking will occur:
import java.util.concurrent.{Future => JFuture}
import scala.concurrent.{Future => SFuture}
val jfuture: JFuture[T] = ???
val promise = Promise[T]()
new Thread(
new Runnable {
def run() { promise.complete(Try{ jfuture.get }) }
}
).start
val future = promise.future
My queston is the same as a question asked in the comments:
what's wrong with
future { jfuture.get }
? Why you used an extra thread combined with Promise?
It was answered as follows:
it'll block thread in your thread pull. If you have a configured ExecutionContext for such futures it's fine, but default ExecutionContext contains as many threads as you have processors.
I'm not sure I understand the explanation. To reiterate:
What's wrong with future { jfuture.get }
? Isn't blocking inside a future the same as manually creating a new Thread and blocking there? If not, how is it different?
There is almost no difference between future { jfuture.get }
and future { future { jfuture.get }}
.
There are as many treads in default thread pool as many you have processors.
With jfuture.get
you'll get 1 thread blocked.
Let's assume you have 8 processors. Also let's suppose each jfuture.get
takes 10 seconds. Now create 8 future { jfuture.get }
.
val format = new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("HH:mm:ss").format(_: Date)
val startTime = new Date
(1 to 8) map {_ => future{ Thread.sleep(10000) }}
future{
2+2
println(s"2+2 done. Start time: ${format(startTime)}, end time: ${format(new Date)}")
}
// 2+2 done. Start time: 20:48:18, end time: 20:48:28
10 seconds is a little too long for 2+2
evaluation.
All other future
s and all actors on the same execution context will be stopped for 10 seconds.
With additional execution context:
object BlockingExecution {
val executor = ExecutionContext.fromExecutor(new ForkJoinPool(20))
}
def blockingFuture[T](f: => T) = {
future( f )(BlockingExecution.executor)
}
val startTime = new Date
(1 to 8) map {_ => blockingFuture{ Thread.sleep(10000) }}
future{
2+2
println(s"2+2 done. Start time: ${format(startTime)}, end time: ${format(new Date)}")
}
// 2+2 done. Start time: 21:26:18, end time: 21:26:18
You could implement blockingFuture
using new Thread(new Runnable {...
, but additional execution context allows you to limit threads count.