Given
struct A
{
void a(void) { std::cout << "A" << std::endl; }
};
const A &a = A(); /* Make a copy of A and bind to a */
const A &b(A()); /* Does nothing */
a.a(); /* Prints A */
b.a(); /* Error, same as if b doesn't exist */
Why does the second form of "bind temporary to const reference" seem to be equivalent to a no-op?
This is just another case of most vexing parse, you're declaring a function rather than a const reference to A
.
You could fix this by using C++11 uniform initialization:
const A &b{A()};