Ant: set property in 1 file, read it in another?

I have the following Ant buildfile importer.xml:

<project name="importer" basedir=".." default="build">
    <import file="imported.xml"/>

    <target name="build">
        <!-- Do some stuff... -->

        <property name="isRunningFromImporter" value="true"/>
        <antcall target="run-now"/>
    </target>
</project>

And another buildfile imported.xml that uses the ant-contrib tasks:

<project name="importer" basedir=".." default="build">
    <!-- Most of file omitted for brevity -->

    <target name="run-now">
        <if>
            <not-equals arg1="${isRunningFromImporter}" arg2="true"/>
            <then>
                <!--
                    This should only execute when the
                    isRunningFromImporter property is not true.
                -->
            </then>
        </if>
    </target>
</project>

The imported#run-now target can be ran as a standalone Ant task, for example:

ant -buildfile imported.xml run-now

In this case I do not want the <then> clause/task executed. However, if you run the same task as it is imported into importer.xml:

ant -buildfile importer.xml build

Then I want the <then> clause/task to execute, however, Ant does no allow me to see a property in one file and read it in another. Any ideas? Thanks in advance!

Solution

It does what you want by default. Antcall's "inheritAll" attribute is set to true.

Running the following code echo's "true" showing the property is in fact set.

<project name="importer" basedir=".." default="build">
    <import file="imported.xml"/>

    <target name="build">
        <!-- Do some stuff... -->

        <property name="isRunningFromImporter" value="true"/>
        <antcall target="run-now"/>
    </target>
</project>

<project name="importer" basedir="..">
    <!-- Most of file omitted for brevity -->

    <target name="run-now">

        <echo>${isRunningFromImporter}</echo>
    </target>
</project>

I'm not familiar with <not-equals arg1="${isRunningFromImporter}" arg2="true"/>. I've always used <not><equals ...> instead. Where does not-equals come from? Are you sure the problem isn't in that line?