I have multiple TabItems in my TabControl; tabItem1, tabItem2, tabItem3...these are
CloseableTabItem.
If I add a node in tabItem1 and press a button to make a subGraph model for this node, the
same node should appear in tabItem2 with a button; so that
tabItem2-Header = nodeName and nodeName = tabItem1-Header.
if i press the button from the node in tabitem2, tabitem1 should be focused. if i close
tabItem1 and press the same Button tabItem1 should be loaded again(this happen in
SubGraphButton_Click).
Do you see a problem with this code?
private void ChildNode_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs args)
{
System.Windows.Controls.Button button = (System.Windows.Controls.Button)sender;
Node node = Part.FindAncestor<Node>(button);
MyNodeData nodeData = node.Data as MyNodeData;
foreach (TabItem item in tabControl.Items)
{
if (nodeData.Text == item.Header.ToString())
{
item.Focus();
}
else if (nodeData.Text != item.Header.ToString())
{
SubGraphButton_Click(sender, args);
}
}
}
private void SubGraphButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs args)
{
string activeDirectory = @"X:\SubGraph\";
string[] files = Directory.GetFiles(activeDirectory);
foreach (string fileName in files)
{
FileStream file = new FileStream(fileName, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read);
System.Windows.Controls.Button button = (System.Windows.Controls.Button)sender;
Node node = Part.FindAncestor<Node>(button);
MyNodeData nodeData = node.Data as MyNodeData;
if (node != null)
{
if (nodeData.Text + ".epk" == fileName.Substring(12, fileName.Length - 12) && !tabControl.Items.Contains(tabItem1))
{
tabControl.Items.Add(tabItem1);
tabItem1.Focus();
var model = new MyGraphLinksModel();
model.Modifiable = true;
model.HasUndoManager = true;
activateDiagram(myDiagram1);
activeDiagram.Model = model;
model.Name = fileName.Substring(12, fileName.Length - 12);
model.Name = model.Name.Substring(0, model.Name.Length - 4);
tabItem1.Header = model.Name;
activeDiagram.PartManager.UpdatesRouteDataPoints = false;
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(file);
string contents = reader.ReadToEnd();
XElement root = XElement.Parse(contents);
activeDiagram.LayoutCompleted += LoadLinkRoutes;
model.Load<MyNodeData, MyLinkData>(root, "MyNodeData", "MyLinkData");
}
}
}
When you modify a collection when it is in the middle of being modified it is rather likely to cause errors. The types of errors, and their likeliness, tend to vary based on what the underlying collection actually is. Modifying a List when iterating it is very likely to give you lots of off by one errors (or off by more than one if you modify it a lot) and potentially out of bounds errors. Modifying a LinkedList could result in null pointer exceptions, infinite loops, accessing non-existent items, etc. but is quite a bit less likely.
Because the chances of problems, in the general case, are rather high, the impact of those problems is also rather high, and the difficulty in diagnosing what actually went wrong (and where) C# chooses to just throw an exception whenever you try to iterate a collection that was modified during the iteration. This way you don't end up with weird, unexpected problems that don't manifest themselves until some time much further down the road then where their root cause is.
There are several different strategies that can be used to avoid this issue:
Iterate over a different collection than the one you really want to modify. In some cases this can simply be done by adding a ToList call on a sequence so that it is moved to a new collection; when doing this the collection being iterated is separate from the one being modified and so there is no error.
You can avoid modifying the actual collection inside of the foreach loop. Common examples of this are creating a List or other collection of "changes to make" whether it's itemsToAdd, itemsToRemove etc. Then you can add/remove/whatever for all of those items after the loop. (This is effective if you are only modifying a small percentage of the size of the collection.)
Certain types of collections can be "iterated" without actually using a traditional iterator (meaning a foreach loop). As an example, you can iterate through a List using a regular for loop instead, and simply modify (increment/decrement) the loop variable whenever you add or remove items. This, when done correctly, tends to be an efficient option, but it's quite easy to make a mistake and get something wrong so while the other options are (marginally) less efficient, they are very good options for non-performance intensive code due to their simplicity.