After hitting a few StackOverflowExceptions in .NET I noticed they completely bypass the unhandled exception handlers that .NET offers (Application.ThreadException / AppDomain.UnhandledException). This is very disturbing since we have critical cleanup code in those exception handlers.
Is there any way to overcome this?
There are three kind of so-called "asynchronous exceptions". That are the ThreadAbortException, the OutOfMemoryException and the mentioned StackOverflowException. Those excepions are allowed to occur at any instruction in your code.
And, there's also a way to overcome them:
The easiest is the ThreadAbortException. When the current code executes in a finally-block. ThreadAbortExceptions are kind of "moved" to the end of the finally-block. So everything in a finally-block can't be aborted by a ThreadAbortException.
To avoid an OutOfMemoryException, you have only one possibility: Do not allocate anything on the Heap. This means that you're not allowed to create any new reference-types.
To overcome the StackOverflowException, you need some help from the Framework. This help manifests in Constrained Execution Regions. The required stack is allocated before the actual code is executed and additionally also ensures that the code is already JIT-Compiled and therefor is available for execution.
There are three forms to execute code in Constrained Execution Regions (copied from the BCL Team Blog):
You can find more at these blog posts:
Constrained Execution Regions and other errata [Brian Grunkemeyer] at the BCL Team Blog.
Joe Duffy's Weblog about Atomicity and asynchronous exception failures where he gives a very good overview over asynchronous exceptions and robustness in the .net Framework.